| [2021] FWCA 1724 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
J Davison Nominees Pty Ltd T/A Davison Earthmovers
(AG2021/4300)
J DAVISON NOMINEES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER PLATT | ADELAIDE, 1 APRIL 2021 |
Application for approval of the J Davison Nominees Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the J Davison Nominees Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by J Davison Nominees Pty Ltd T/A Davison Earthmovers (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 29 March 2021. I note that the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) advised the Agreements team on 24 March 2021 that it sought to intervene and requested certain information be provided. On 30 March 2021 my Associate emailed the CFMEU and asked that they provide details of the basis on which they wished to intervene and any concerns in respect of the approval of the Agreement by 4.00pm, 1 April 2021. No response was received. This application has been determined on the papers.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 1 April 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE510920 PR728217>
- AGLC
- J Davison Nominees Pty Ltd T/A Davison Earthmovers [2021] FWCA 1724
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 1724
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that arose from this application included whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it provided for a genuine enterprise, and whether it contained all the required minimum terms as specified under the Act. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the agreement was free from any unlawful provisions that would render it invalid. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and balanced, while no other party contested the application.
The Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement was made in good faith and represented a genuine enterprise. It satisfied all the minimum terms required by the Fair Work Act 2009 and did not contain any unlawful provisions. The Commission approved the agreement, concluding that it met all the necessary statutory requirements and was fair and reasonable in its terms. Consequently, the applicant's application for approval of the enterprise agreement was successful.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.