Ivins v James Cook University

Case [2001] QCA 284


[2001] QCA 284

COURT OF APPEAL

McMURDO P

Appeal No 1350 of 2001

CHRISTINE JOY IVINS                 Appellant (Applicant)

and

JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY             Respondent (Respondent)

BRISBANE

..DATE 19/07/2001

ORDER

THE PRESIDENT:   This appeal was filed on 9 February 2001 by the appellant who represents herself.  The appellant has refused to settle an index for the record book.  The index was due on 20 April and the record book was due on 4 May and
an application seeking exemption from payment of record book fees was refused by the Registrar, Mr Toogood, on 15 May 2001.  The Deputy Registrar, Appeals, has directed the appellant to engage in discussions with the respondent regarding settlement of the record book index and preparation of the record book.

She has been reminded of her responsibilities as an appellant in relation to the preparation of the record book by the Registry, but has continually insisted there is nothing further for her to provide to the Court.  She has presently filed affidavit material which annexes a copy of the order and the judgment of the primary judge, but other material and the transcript of hearing has not been provided to the Court.  She said that she was under the misapprehension that no transcript of the hearing was available, but Mr Jackson who appears for the respondent has indicated to me that a transcript is available.

...

THE PRESIDENT:  The appellant has indicated her reluctance to further this matter because of the cost of it, saying that she was forced to bring this appeal because of Registry error. She does not go so far as to say, however, that she does not wish to pursue this appeal. 

In these circumstances in order to pursue the appeal I make the following directions.  I direct that a record book index be provided containing the following matters:  the originating application before the primary judge;  all affidavit material that was placed before the primary judge by both parties;  the transcript of proceedings before the primary judge;  the judgment of the primary judge and the order arising from that judgment, and a copy of the notice of appeal.  And that index is to be filed within 14 days.  The appeal record book is to be filed and served within 28 days.

If these directions are not complied with the matter is to be listed as soon as convenient before a Court of Appeal for the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be struck out for want of prosecution.

I order the appellant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to today's hearing.

...

‑‑‑‑‑

Details
AGLC
Ivins v James Cook University [2001] QCA 284
Case
[2001] QCA 284
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal, Ivins v James Cook University, was heard by the Queensland Court of Appeal. Christine Joy Ivins, the appellant, appealed against the decision of James Cook University, the respondent. The main issue in this case was whether Ivins had complied with the court's requirements for the preparation and submission of an appeal record book. The case arose from a refusal by the Registrar to exempt Ivins from paying the fees for the record book, and the subsequent refusal of an application to strike out the appeal for want of prosecution due to Ivins' failure to comply with the directions given by the Court.

The legal issues before the court were whether the appellant had fulfilled her obligations under the court's directions and whether the appeal should be struck out due to non-compliance. Ivins argued that the reason she did not comply with the court's directions was due to the Registry's error. The Court of Appeal considered the appellant's reasons for non-compliance and the steps she had taken to remedy the situation. The court determined that while the appellant had some justification for her delay, she had not taken sufficient action to address the deficiencies in the record book.

The Court of Appeal directed Ivins to provide a complete record book index and the record book itself within specified timeframes. The court warned that failure to comply with these directions would result in the appeal being struck out. The Court also ordered Ivins to pay the respondent's costs of the hearing. The appeal was to proceed only if Ivins complied with the directions issued by the Court of Appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.