IVEY & ALLPORT
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 1887
•19 August 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
IVEY & ALLPORT [2014] FCCA 1887
[2014] FCCA 1887
19 August 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Family Court of Australia, Judge Scarlett considered an application concerning parenting orders for two children, X and Y. The dispute involved the best interests of the children, parental responsibility, and an application for a change of venue to the Brisbane Registry.
The court was required to determine the appropriate venue for the proceedings, the need for an interpreter for the Respondent Father, and the independent representation of the children. Furthermore, the court had to consider the living arrangements for the children, the allocation of parental responsibility, and the time the Applicant Mother would spend with them.
Judge Scarlett ordered that the proceeding be transferred to the Brisbane Registry and listed for mention before Judge Jarrett. The court directed that an interpreter in the (omitted) language be provided for the Respondent Father and requested Legal Aid Queensland to arrange independent legal representation for the children under section 68L of the *Family Law Act 1975*. The parties were ordered to provide all relevant documents to Legal Aid Queensland for the Independent Children’s Lawyer. The Applicant Mother was directed to return the children to the care of the Respondent Father within fourteen days, and the children were to live with the Respondent Father until further order. The parties were granted equal shared parental responsibility, and the Applicant Mother was to spend time with the children for half of each Queensland school holiday and at other agreed times.
The court was required to determine the appropriate venue for the proceedings, the need for an interpreter for the Respondent Father, and the independent representation of the children. Furthermore, the court had to consider the living arrangements for the children, the allocation of parental responsibility, and the time the Applicant Mother would spend with them.
Judge Scarlett ordered that the proceeding be transferred to the Brisbane Registry and listed for mention before Judge Jarrett. The court directed that an interpreter in the (omitted) language be provided for the Respondent Father and requested Legal Aid Queensland to arrange independent legal representation for the children under section 68L of the *Family Law Act 1975*. The parties were ordered to provide all relevant documents to Legal Aid Queensland for the Independent Children’s Lawyer. The Applicant Mother was directed to return the children to the care of the Respondent Father within fourteen days, and the children were to live with the Respondent Father until further order. The parties were granted equal shared parental responsibility, and the Applicant Mother was to spend time with the children for half of each Queensland school holiday and at other agreed times.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
IVEY & ALLPORT [2014] FCCA 1887
Cases Citing This Decision
0