[2013] FWCA 2773 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
ITS Trenchless Pty Ltd
(AG2013/432)
ITS TRENCHLESS EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MACDONALD | SYDNEY, 6 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of ITS Trenchless Employee Collective Agreement 2013 .
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ITS Trenchless Employee Collective Agreement 2013 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The application has been made by ITS Trenchless Pty Ltd (“the applicant”). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 relevant to this application for approval has been met. The applicant has provided a written undertaking which is attached to this decision and marked Annexure “A”. I note that, under s.191 of the Act, the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date is 13 May 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {G}, AE401092 PR536298>
ANNEXURE “A”
- AGLC
- ITS Trenchless Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 2773
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2773
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the Commission had to decide included whether the Agreement contained all the mandatory terms required by section 229 of the Fair Work Act, whether the Agreement was consistent with the Fair Work Act’s public interest and object of providing for “fair work outcomes”, and whether the Agreement had been negotiated in good faith. Additionally, the Commission needed to consider whether the Agreement complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act.
In determining the application, the Commission found that the Agreement contained all the mandatory terms required by the Fair Work Act and was consistent with the Act’s public interest and object. The Commission also concluded that the Agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that all procedural requirements had been met. The Commission noted that the Agreement provided for improved terms and conditions for employees, including increased wages and better access to leave provisions. The Commission found that these improvements aligned with the objective of providing fair work outcomes.
Accordingly, the Commission approved the Agreement under section 233 of the Fair Work Act. The applicant was authorised to implement the Agreement on the terms and conditions specified in the approval. The Commission emphasised that the approval was subject to compliance with all terms and conditions of the Agreement and that any failure to do so could result in the Agreement being declared void.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.