Irish & Michelle

Case

[2009] FamCA 66

6 February 2009


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Irish & Michelle [2009] FamCA 66 [2009] FamCA 66 6 February 2009

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application by Mr Irish (the applicant father) and Ms Michelle (the respondent mother) regarding the parenting arrangements for their two children, B and J. The dispute involved determining with whom the children would live and the extent of each parent's involvement in their lives, particularly in light of allegations of parental alienation and the children's expressed views. The case was heard by Benjamin J in the Family Court of Australia.

The court was required to determine several key legal issues. These included whether to make orders for equal shared parental responsibility, with whom the children would live, and how the children would spend time with each parent. A significant consideration was the weight to be given to the children's views, particularly B's, and the court's assessment of the creditworthiness of the parties and the evidence presented. The court also had to address the issue of parental alienation and its impact on the children's relationship with their father.

In reaching its decision, the court considered various reports, including a family report and a single expert psychological report, as well as the evidence of an independent psychologist, Ms R. Ms R's evidence detailed a particularly difficult changeover where both children exhibited strong resistance to spending time with their father, employing a repetitive mantra and, in B's case, escalating distress. The court noted that B appeared to be able to switch her emotions on and off, and that J's behaviour was influenced by B. The court also observed that the father maintained a calm demeanour throughout the difficult interaction. The court ultimately found that while the children would live with the father, they would spend substantial time with the mother during school holidays due to geographical limitations and the impracticality of frequent travel. The court also made orders restraining the parties from denigrating each other in the presence of the children and requiring them to facilitate therapy for B to address issues arising from conflict and anxiety.

The court ordered that the mother and father have equal shared parental responsibility for B and J. The children were to live with the father, subject to specific arrangements for the children to live with the mother during various school holiday periods, weekends, and on specific occasions such as birthdays and Mother's Day. The orders also detailed communication arrangements between the children and the mother, financial contributions towards travel costs, and provisions for notification of address changes, significant medical issues, and attendance at school and extracurricular events. The court also ordered that both parties facilitate B's attendance at therapy and share the costs equally.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Evidence

Legal Concepts

  • Expert Evidence

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Reliance

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

2

Baulkham and Lester [2017] FCCA 2311
Habib v Radio 2UE Pty Ltd [2011] NSWDC 52
Cases Cited

4

Statutory Material Cited

0

G & C [2006] FamCA 994
Newlands & Newlands [2007] FamCA 168
C & C [2004] FamCA 708