[2013] FWCA 7895 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Ipswich Grammar School
(AG2013/2676)
IPSWICH GRAMMAR SCHOOL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Educational services | |
VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI | SYDNEY, 9 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Ipswich Grammar School Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ipswich Grammar School Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Ipswich Grammar School. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Independent Education Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2014.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE404661 PR543055>
- AGLC
- Ipswich Grammar School [2013] FWCA 7895
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7895
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether certain provisions of the agreement complied with the applicable legislative framework, particularly the Education (General Provisions) Act 2006 and the Education (State Schools) Act 1912. The Commission had to determine if the provisions governing employment terms and conditions, including those related to remuneration, hours of work, and dispute resolution, were in line with the legislative standards.
After thorough examination, the Commission found that most of the provisions in the agreement were consistent with the legislative requirements. However, the Commission identified some discrepancies in the calculation of certain allowances and the handling of overtime. The Commission directed the parties to negotiate and resolve these issues. Once amended, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it to be compliant with the relevant legislation. The court ordered that the agreement be registered, effective from the specified date, subject to the negotiated amendments.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.