Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Ip v Hunters Hill Council [2010] NSWLEC 1372 PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
J Ip
Hunters Hill CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 10504 of 2010 CORAM: Moore SC KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 DATES OF HEARING: 30 November and 22 December 2010 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 22 December 2010 LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT
Mr S Klinger, solicitorRESPONDENT
Mr J Cole, solicitor
HWL Ebsworth
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESMOORE SC
22 December 2010
JUDGMENT10/10504 Ip v Hunters Hill Council
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: These proceedings concern a proposed development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill. There was a significant disagreement between the applicant and the council concerning the originally proposed development that was unable to be resolved during the course of a conciliation conference. As a consequence the matter fell to me to hear and determine.
2 During the course of the on-site hearing, it became obvious that, with some further discussions between the parties, the matters that remained in dispute were capable of being resolved. That subsequently occurred and, as a consequence, the parties now present consent orders for me to make based on revised plans.
3 The consent orders also reflect an agreement between the parties that, as a consequence of the amendments, which are not minor – but are purely ameliorative in nature, the costs required to be awarded pursuant to s 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 are in the agreed sum of one dollar.
4 As a consequence, it is neither necessary nor appropriate for me to contemplate any matters relating to the form of the order pursuant to s 97B in light of that agreement.
5 As a further consequence, subject to the transmission of the agreed conditions of consent to the Court electronically, orders will be made upholding the appeal by consent and granting development consent to the proposed two storey duplex development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill.
Tim Moore
Senior Commissioner
- AGLC
- Ip v Hunters Hill Council [2010] NSWLEC 1372
- Case
- [2010] NSWLEC 1372
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
During the on-site hearing, it became apparent that the remaining issues could be resolved with further discussions between the parties. The consent orders were based on revised plans and reflected an agreement that the amendments were not minor but were purely ameliorative in nature. The parties also agreed that the costs required to be awarded pursuant to s 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 would be one dollar. The Senior Commissioner found that it was neither necessary nor appropriate to contemplate any matters relating to the form of the order pursuant to s 97B in light of the agreement. The Court was satisfied with the consent orders and, subject to the transmission of the agreed conditions of consent to the Court electronically, orders would be made upholding the appeal by consent and granting development consent to the proposed two-storey duplex development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill.
The final orders of the court were to grant development consent to the proposed two-storey duplex development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill, subject to the transmission of the agreed conditions of consent to the Court electronically. The court was satisfied with the consent orders agreed upon by the parties, which reflected an agreement that the amendments were purely ameliorative in nature and that the costs required to be awarded pursuant to s 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 would be one dollar.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.