Ip v Hunters Hill Council

Case [2010] NSWLEC 1372



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Ip v Hunters Hill Council [2010] NSWLEC 1372
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
J Ip

RESPONDENT
Hunters Hill Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10504 of 2010
CORAM: Moore SC
KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 30 November and 22 December 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 22 December 2010
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
Mr S Klinger, solicitor

RESPONDENT
Mr J Cole, solicitor
HWL Ebsworth


JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      MOORE SC

      22 December 2010

      10/10504 Ip v Hunters Hill Council

      JUDGMENT
      This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.

1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: These proceedings concern a proposed development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill. There was a significant disagreement between the applicant and the council concerning the originally proposed development that was unable to be resolved during the course of a conciliation conference. As a consequence the matter fell to me to hear and determine.

2 During the course of the on-site hearing, it became obvious that, with some further discussions between the parties, the matters that remained in dispute were capable of being resolved. That subsequently occurred and, as a consequence, the parties now present consent orders for me to make based on revised plans.

3 The consent orders also reflect an agreement between the parties that, as a consequence of the amendments, which are not minor – but are purely ameliorative in nature, the costs required to be awarded pursuant to s 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 are in the agreed sum of one dollar.

4 As a consequence, it is neither necessary nor appropriate for me to contemplate any matters relating to the form of the order pursuant to s 97B in light of that agreement.

5 As a further consequence, subject to the transmission of the agreed conditions of consent to the Court electronically, orders will be made upholding the appeal by consent and granting development consent to the proposed two storey duplex development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill.

Tim Moore


Senior Commissioner

Details
AGLC
Ip v Hunters Hill Council [2010] NSWLEC 1372
Case
[2010] NSWLEC 1372
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case concerns a proposed development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill, between the applicant, J Ip, and the Hunters Hill Council. The matter was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, presided over by Senior Commissioner Tim Moore. The key issue was whether to grant development consent for a proposed two-storey duplex development based on consent orders agreed upon by the parties after the original dispute could not be resolved during a conciliation conference.

During the on-site hearing, it became apparent that the remaining issues could be resolved with further discussions between the parties. The consent orders were based on revised plans and reflected an agreement that the amendments were not minor but were purely ameliorative in nature. The parties also agreed that the costs required to be awarded pursuant to s 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 would be one dollar. The Senior Commissioner found that it was neither necessary nor appropriate to contemplate any matters relating to the form of the order pursuant to s 97B in light of the agreement. The Court was satisfied with the consent orders and, subject to the transmission of the agreed conditions of consent to the Court electronically, orders would be made upholding the appeal by consent and granting development consent to the proposed two-storey duplex development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill.

The final orders of the court were to grant development consent to the proposed two-storey duplex development at 18 Aston Street, Hunters Hill, subject to the transmission of the agreed conditions of consent to the Court electronically. The court was satisfied with the consent orders agreed upon by the parties, which reflected an agreement that the amendments were purely ameliorative in nature and that the costs required to be awarded pursuant to s 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 would be one dollar.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.