Inwood v Marrickville Council

Case [2008] NSWLEC 1338



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Inwood v Marrickville Council [2008] NSWLEC 1338
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Brad Inwood

RESPONDENT
Marrickville Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10541 of 2008
CORAM: Tuor C
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- Appeal against conditions of development consent for alterations and additions to a semi detached dwelling - consent orders
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 11/07/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 11 July 2008
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
Ms P Burns, solicitor
of Maddocks Lawyers

RESPONDENT
Mr G Christmas, solicitor
of Marrickville Council


JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Tuor C

      11 July 2008

      10541 of 2008 Brad Inwood v Marrickville Council

      JUDGMENT

1 This is an appeal against conditions imposed by Marrickville Council (council) on the consent for an application for alterations and additions to an existing semi detached house at 40 Croydon Street, Petersham (the site). The parties are seeking consent orders from the Court.

2 The conditions include a deferred commencement condition which requires the removal of the ensuite bathroom which was to be located within the access way at the side of the house. Council’s principal concern related to the visibility of the ensuite from the street and also the lack of symmetry that would result between the two semi-detached houses.

3 Discussions with the applicant and the council have taken place which has resulted in an agreement to place a camellia to screen the ensuite from the street. There is also a camellia in a similar location on the adjoining semi.

4 The applicant has also agreed to an additional condition which will require that the front of the ensuite be brick to match the brick of the existing dwelling.

5 On this basis I am satisfied that the issues between the parties have been resolved and that the consent orders sought by the parties may be issued.


6 The orders of the Court by consent are:


          1. The appeal in respect of the property known as 40 Croydon Street, Petersham is upheld.

          2. Development Consent is granted to development Application No. DA2007/00282 for alterations and additions to the rear of the existing dwelling subject to the conditions in Annexure A.

          3. The exhibits, except Exhibits 1 and A, may be returned.

___________________

      Annelise Tuor
      Commissioner of the Court
      ljr
Details
AGLC
Inwood v Marrickville Council [2008] NSWLEC 1338
Case
[2008] NSWLEC 1338
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, the applicant Brad Inwood brought an appeal against Marrickville Council regarding the conditions imposed on the consent for alterations and additions to a semi-detached dwelling at 40 Croydon Street, Petersham. The central issue in the case was the imposition of certain conditions by the Council on the development consent, specifically a deferred commencement condition that mandated the removal of an ensuite bathroom intended to be located within the access way at the side of the house. The Council's primary concerns were the visibility of the ensuite from the street and the lack of symmetry that would result between the two semi-detached houses.

The court had to determine whether the conditions imposed by the Council were justified and whether the applicant's appeal against these conditions should be upheld. The applicant argued that the conditions were too stringent and unnecessary, while the Council maintained that the conditions were essential to maintain the aesthetic integrity and privacy of the properties in the area. The court considered the arguments from both sides and the subsequent negotiations between the parties, which resulted in an agreement to screen the ensuite with a camellia and match the front of the ensuite with the brick of the existing dwelling.

The reasoning of the court was based on the resolution of the issues between the parties, as they had reached an agreement that satisfied the concerns of both the applicant and the Council. The court was satisfied that the agreed conditions would adequately address the concerns of the Council while allowing the applicant to proceed with the alterations and additions to the dwelling. Therefore, the court granted the appeal and issued the consent orders sought by the parties. The orders included the upholding of the appeal, the granting of development consent subject to specific conditions, and the return of the exhibits, except for Exhibits 1 and A.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.