| [2016] FWCA 3282 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
InteriorCo Vic Pty Ltd T/A Zenith Interiors
(AG2016/2865)
ZENITH INTERIORS SANDRINGHAM ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 24 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Zenith Interiors Sandringham Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Zenith Interiors Sandringham Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by InteriorCo Vic Pty Ltd T/A Zenith Interiors. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 31 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 29 February 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE419082 PR580691>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- InteriorCo Vic Pty Ltd T/A Zenith Interiors [2016] FWCA 3282
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3282
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the objections raised by the union and examined the terms and conditions of the proposed agreement. It assessed whether the agreement provided for appropriate pay and conditions, including minimum rates of pay, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and other benefits. The Commission also evaluated the procedural fairness of the bargaining process leading to the agreement. After careful consideration, the Commission determined that the agreement did not meet the fairness test under section 234 of the Act. The Commission found that the agreement contained provisions that were not in the best interests of the employees and did not provide adequate protections.
Consequently, the application for approval of the Zenith Interiors Sandringham Enterprise Agreement 2016 was dismissed. The decision highlighted the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide fair and reasonable terms for employees and comply with the statutory requirements for approval. The dismissal of the application underscores the need for careful scrutiny of enterprise agreements to protect the interests of workers.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.