[2013] FWCA 7869 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Intergrated Packaging Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2013/9660)
INTEGRATED PACKAGING AUSTRALIA P/L - CONVERSION & NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013-2016
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 8 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Integrated Packaging Australia P/L - Conversion & National Union of Workers Collective Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Integrated Packaging Australia P/L - Conversion & National Union of Workers Collective Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Integrated Packaging Australia Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] An undertaking has been given in relation to the part time employment provisions in the Agreement and this undertaking has become a term of the Agreement in accordance with s.191(1) of the Act and is appended at Appendix A.
[4] The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 15 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE404643 PR543022>
APPENDIX A
- AGLC
- Intergrated Packaging Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7869
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7869
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the evidence and submissions provided by both parties. The proposed agreement contained provisions that were not in line with the public interest as defined by the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the agreement included provisions that would allow for the payment of wages below the applicable award rates and conditions, which was deemed to be contrary to public policy. The Commission also found that the agreement did not meet the "better off overall test" as it did not provide for a sufficient increase in wages and conditions for the majority of the employees. As a result, the Commission refused to approve and register the proposed agreement.
In its decision, the Commission emphasised the importance of protecting the rights of employees and ensuring that enterprise agreements promote the public interest. The Commission noted that enterprise agreements should provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and should not undermine the protections provided by awards. The Commission's decision serves as a reminder to parties negotiating enterprise agreements to ensure that they comply with the requirements of the Fair Work Act and promote the public interest. The Commission refused to approve and register the proposed agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.