[2014] FWCA 3732 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Intercon Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2014/1213)
INTERCON ENGINEERING PTY LTD APLNG UPSTREAM PROJECT UNION GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 6 JUNE 2014 |
Application for approval of the Intercon Engineering Pty Ltd APLNG Upstream Project Union Greenfields Agreement 2014.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 26 May 2014 by Intercon Engineering Pty Ltd for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the Intercon Engineering Pty Ltd APLNG Upstream Project Union Greenfields Agreement 2014(“the Agreement”).
[2] Statutory declarations were provided by:
- Mr R. Webb, State Secretary, of the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (“the AMWU”);
- Mr B. Swan, Queensland Branch Secretary, of the Australian Workers’ Union (“the AWU”); and
- Mr P. Simpson, Divisional Branch Secretary, of the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (“the CEPU”).
[3] In light of these statutory declarations and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the AMWU, AWU and CEPU are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[4] On 5 June 2014, the Employer provided an undertaking to the Fair Work Commission. This undertaking is attached to and taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] In light of the Employer’s undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The consultation clause does not conform with s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[7] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE408477 PR551471>
- AGLC
- Intercon Engineering Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 3732
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3732
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues at hand required the Commission to assess whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees involved. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, including the requirement for the agreement to be free from coercion and undue influence. The Commission also had to evaluate if the agreement was consistent with the principles of enterprise flexibility and whether it provided for adequate protections for employees.
In delivering its decision, the Commission carefully examined the evidence presented and considered the arguments from both parties. The Commission concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees. It was determined that the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act and did not contain any elements of coercion or undue influence. Furthermore, the Commission found that the agreement was consistent with the principles of enterprise flexibility and provided for adequate protections for the employees. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the agreement, allowing it to take effect and govern the employment terms for the workers involved in the Intercon Engineering Pty Ltd APLNG Upstream Project.
The Fair Work Commission's decision to approve the Intercon Engineering Pty Ltd APLNG Upstream Project Union Greenfields Agreement 2014 was made on the basis that the agreement met all the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith, provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees, and was consistent with the principles of enterprise flexibility. The final orders of the Commission were to approve the agreement, allowing it to be implemented and to govern the employment terms for the workers involved in the project.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.