| [2021] FWCA 3374 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Integrated Steelmill Services Pty Ltd t/a Steelstone Sydney
(AG2021/5478)
INTEGRATED STEEL MILL SERVICES PTY LTD AWU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI | MELBOURNE, 11 JUNE 2021 |
Application for approval of the Integrated Steel Mill Services Pty Ltd AWU Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[1] Steelstone Sydney has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Integrated Steel Mill Services Pty Ltd AWU Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and related materials, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 11 June 2021 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 18 June 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2024.
[5] For the purposes of publication, the signature page of the Agreement has been redacted in part, for confidentiality and as the enterprise agreement when made did not contain the redacted details. 1
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
1 The Australian Workers’ Union v Oji Foodservice Packaging Solutions (Aus) Pty Ltd [2018] FWCFB 7501.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511817 PR730649>
- AGLC
- Integrated Steelmill Services Pty Ltd t/a Steelstone Sydney [2021] FWCA 3374
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 3374
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement provided employees with a direct financial benefit, or benefits that were not financial but were otherwise advantageous, which outweighed any disadvantages. This required the Commission to consider whether the agreement was in the interests of the employees, having regard to the objects of the Act. Specifically, the Commission had to assess the terms and conditions of the agreement against the criteria set out in section 235 of the Act, including whether the agreement promoted high and productive employment, and encouraged flexibility and efficiency in the workplace.
The Commission examined the submissions and evidence provided by both parties. It found that the agreement provided employees with improved wage rates, shift penalties, allowances, and other employment conditions which were better than the applicable awards. The Commission concluded that the overall benefits provided by the agreement were sufficient to meet the better off overall test. It noted that the agreement promoted productive employment and encouraged flexibility and efficiency in the workplace. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was in the interests of the employees and approved the agreement under section 233 of the Act.
The Commission ordered that the agreement be registered and become a registered agreement from 1 April 2021. It also directed that a copy of the approved agreement be served on the employer, the union, and the registrar of the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.