Ingold & Ingold

In the matter of *Ingold & Ingold*, Justice Baumann of the Family Court of Australia was required to determine the form of orders to be made in proceedings between the parties. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but the court's reasons indicate a need for agreed orders to be submitted or, failing agreement, for further submissions on the form of the order.

The central legal issue before the court was the finalisation of orders following the court's substantive reasons delivered on 28 October 2019. This involved determining the precise terms of those orders and ensuring they accurately reflected the court's findings and directions. The court needed to facilitate the parties' agreement on these terms or, if that proved impossible, to provide a mechanism for the court to settle the form of the orders.

Justice Baumann directed the parties to submit an agreed order by 4.00 pm on 11 November 2019, which was to comply with the court's previous reasons. In the event that the parties could not reach an agreement on the terms of the order by that deadline, the proceedings were adjourned to 9.30 am on 18 November 2019. At that adjourned hearing, the court would receive oral or written submissions regarding the form of the order. The parties and their legal representatives were granted leave to appear by telephone for this adjourned hearing.