Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 2405


[2025] FWCA 2405

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s 185—Enterprise agreement

Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd

(AG2025/2120)

INGHAMS ENTERPRISES (WA HATCHERY) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Poultry processing

COMMISSIONER LIM

PERTH, 21 JULY 2025

Application for approval of the Inghams Enterprises (WA Hatchery) Enterprise Agreement 2025.

  1. Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd (the Applicant) has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Inghams Enterprises (WA Hatchery) Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. I note that the following clauses in the Agreement appear to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (the NES):

(a)Clause 5.7(3) provides that that the employer may substitute a public holiday for another day. This appears to be inconsistent with s 115(3) of the Act, which provides that the substitution of a public holiday with another day may only occur by agreement between the employer and an individual employee. It appears the Agreement does not specify there must be agreement.

(b)Clause 7.6 provides a mechanism for the employer to terminate the employee when they have abandoned their employment. It states that in the event an employee is absent from work for 3 consecutive days, the company may consider the employee has abandoned their employment. Further, if within 7 days from that point the employee has not satisfied the company there was a reasonable excuse, the abandonment will take effect from the first day of absence. In light of the decision in Bienias v Iplex Pipelines Australia Pty Limited[2017] FWCFB 38 at [58], it is unclear whether the employer is required to make reasonable steps to contact the employee, allowing sufficient time to respond (or provide notice of termination).

  1. However, I am satisfied that under clause 1.8 of the Agreement, the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union and the United Workers’ Union (UWU) (together, the organisations), being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s 201(2), and based on the declarations provided by the organisations, I note that the organisations are covered by the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 21 July 2025 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 28 July 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2028.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE529770  PR789862>

Details
AGLC
Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 2405
Case
[2025] FWCA 2405
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a proposed enterprise agreement, the Inghams Enterprises (WA Hatchery) Enterprise Agreement 2025. The agreement, if approved, would apply to employees of the company's Western Australian hatchery operations. The dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement complied with the relevant federal legislation and if it met the necessary standards for fair and equitable treatment of employees.

The court needed to determine whether the proposed agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, including provisions concerning procedural fairness, and if it contained minimum terms and conditions as required by the law. The court also examined if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including any necessary protections for employees.

In considering the application, the court assessed the procedural fairness of the bargaining process and the content of the proposed agreement. The court concluded that the agreement was procedurally fair and contained terms and conditions that met the statutory requirements. The proposed agreement provided for appropriate protections and benefits for employees, and the court found no non-compliance with the relevant legislative provisions. As a result, the court approved the proposed agreement, finding it to be fair and reasonable.

The final orders of the court were that the Inghams Enterprises (WA Hatchery) Enterprise Agreement 2025 be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement would now apply to the employees of Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd's Western Australian hatchery operations, effective from the date of registration.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.