| [2023] FWCA 521 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Infrabuild Trading Pty Ltd T/A Tonkin Steel
(AG2023/229)
Tonkin Steel Enterprise Agreement 2022 - 2025
| Storage services | |
| COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC | MELBOURNE, 20 FEBRUARY 2023 |
Application for approval of the Tonkin Steel Enterprise Agreement 2022 - 2025
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tonkin Steel Enterprise Agreement 2022 - 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Infrabuild Trading Pty Ltd T/A Tonkin Steel. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 1.5.1 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement was approved on 20 February 2023 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 27 February 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 December 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE519227 PR750736>
- AGLC
- Infrabuild Trading Pty Ltd T/A Tonkin Steel [2023] FWCA 521
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 521
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement contained mandatory terms as required by section 235 of the Act, and if it allowed for genuine bargaining as per section 228. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and if it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions. Another issue was whether the agreement contained any terms that might be contrary to public policy or the public interest.
The Commission found that the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. The agreement contained all the mandatory terms stipulated by section 235 of the Act, and it demonstrated evidence of genuine bargaining. The terms and conditions of the agreement were fair and reasonable, and they were in the best interests of the employees. The Commission also concluded that the agreement did not contain any terms that were contrary to public policy or the public interest. Consequently, the Commission approved the Tonkin Steel Enterprise Agreement 2022-2025.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.