[2013] FWCA 1964 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Independent Education Union of Australia
(AG2013/685)
JIMBOOMBA COMMUNITY KINDERGARTEN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 2 APRIL 2013 |
Application for variation of the Jimboomba Community Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2011.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the Jimboomba Community Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2011(Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by the Independent Education Union of Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] In accordance with s.210(3)(a)) of the Act, an application for approval of a variation must be made within 14 days after the variation is made. The variation was made on 6 March 2013, and date of lodgement was 21 March 2013. The application was therefore 1 day out of time. The applicant gave sufficient reason as to why the Tribunal should extend the time for lodgement of the agreement for approval pursuant to s.210(3)(b)) of the Act. Therefore, I am satisfied that the extension of time to lodge the application should be granted.
[3] The variation can be found at Attachment 1 to this decision.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[5] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate on and from 2 April 2013.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE888469 PR535285>
- AGLC
- Independent Education Union of Australia [2013] FWCA 1964
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1964
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court needed to address included whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were reasonable and fair, and whether the application met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court also considered the impact of the proposed changes on the employees and the overall fairness and balance of the agreement. The court examined whether the application demonstrated that the proposed changes would benefit the employees and align with the principles of industrial fairness and good faith bargaining.
The Fair Work Commission found that the application did not sufficiently demonstrate that the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were fair and reasonable. The court highlighted several shortcomings in the application, including inadequate justification for the proposed changes and insufficient evidence of the impact on employees. The court determined that the application did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act, leading to the dismissal of the application. Consequently, the enterprise agreement remained unchanged, and no variations were approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.