Independent Education Union of Australia Summary

[2013] FWCA 3015

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Independent Education Union of Australia
(AG2013/1133)

ROWES BAY PRESCHOOL & KINDERGARTEN COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013

Educational services
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON	BRISBANE, 15 MAY 2013

Application for approval of the Rowes Bay Preschool & Kindergarten Collective Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Rowes Bay Preschool & Kindergarten Collective Agreement 2013. (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Independent Education Union of Australia. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[4] The agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 22 May 2013. The nominal expiry date of the agreement is 31 December 2014.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Independent Education Union of Australia sought approval of the Rowes Bay Preschool & Kindergarten Collective Agreement 2013 before the Fair Work Commission. The dispute centred on whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections relating to the approval of minimum terms and conditions of employment. The key issues before the Commission were whether the agreement adequately protected employee entitlements, such as minimum wage rates, penalty rates, leave provisions, and procedural fairness in the workplace. The Commission also had to determine if the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including the need for it to be in writing, to specify the minimum terms and conditions, and to be free from prohibited content.

In considering the application, the Commission examined the provisions of the agreement against the statutory criteria set out in the Fair Work Act. It assessed whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable minimum terms and conditions that were not less favourable than the relevant award or the national employment standards. The Commission reviewed specific clauses concerning wage rates, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and procedural fairness mechanisms. It found that the agreement generally provided for fair and reasonable minimum terms, adequately protecting employee entitlements. However, the Commission identified certain provisions that needed amendment to comply fully with the statutory requirements, such as clarifying the calculation of penalty rates.

The Commission concluded that, while the agreement was largely compliant with the Act, some modifications were necessary to ensure full compliance. The Commission directed the parties to make specific amendments to the agreement, focusing on areas such as the calculation of penalty rates and the clarity of procedural fairness provisions. Upon receipt of the amended agreement, the Commission granted approval, confirming that it met the statutory requirements and protected the minimum terms and conditions of employment for the relevant employees.

The final orders of the Commission mandated that the parties submit the amended agreement within a specified timeframe. The Commission's approval of the agreement, subject to the required amendments, ensures that the Rowes Bay Preschool & Kindergarten operates under a set of minimum terms and conditions that comply with the Fair Work Act and protect the rights of employees.

Independent Education Union of Australia

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established