Independent Education Union of Australia Summary

[2013] FWCA 8810

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Independent Education Union of Australia
(AG2013/11153)

CABARITA MORTLAKE KINDERGARTEN INC TEACHERS AGREEMENT 2013

Educational services
COMMISSIONER MCKENNA	SYDNEY, 8 NOVEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Cabarita Mortlake Kindergarten Inc Teachers Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cabarita Mortlake Kindergarten Inc Teachers Agreement 2013 (“the Agreement”). The application has been made by the Independent Education Union of Australia, as an employee organisation bargaining representative, pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval has been met.

[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia NSW/ACT Branch has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date is two years thereafter.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent decision of the Fair Work Commission, the case of Independent Education Union of Australia involved an application for the approval of the Cabarita Mortlake Kindergarten Inc Teachers Agreement 2013. The Independent Education Union of Australia sought the approval of this agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement aimed to regulate the terms and conditions of employment for teachers within the kindergarten. The dispute centred around the compliance of the proposed agreement with the relevant legislative framework and whether it adequately addressed the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

The legal issues that the Commission was required to determine included whether the agreement met the criteria for approval as set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement provided for the minimum terms and conditions of employment, ensured procedural fairness, and complied with other statutory requirements. Additionally, the Commission had to consider the fairness of the agreement in the context of the bargaining power of the parties and the broader industrial relations landscape.

In reaching its decision, the Commission meticulously reviewed the proposed agreement against the statutory benchmarks. The Commission found that the agreement was comprehensive and provided for the minimum terms and conditions as required by the Act. It was noted that the agreement included provisions for procedural fairness, which were deemed adequate. The Commission also considered the bargaining power of the parties and the overall fairness of the agreement, concluding that it struck a reasonable balance between the interests of the teachers and the kindergarten. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, recognising its compliance with the legislative requirements and its fairness in the industrial relations context.

The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the Cabarita Mortlake Kindergarten Inc Teachers Agreement 2013, subject to certain conditions aimed at ensuring ongoing compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission directed that the agreement would come into effect on a specified date, providing a clear timeline for its implementation. This decision effectively resolved the dispute and established the terms under which teachers would be employed at the kindergarten.

Independent Education Union of Australia

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established