| [2014] FWCA 6708 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Independent Education Union of Australia
(AG2014/7291)
BAYVIEW KINDERGARTEN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 25 SEPTEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Bayview Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Bayview Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Independent Education Union of Australia.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] On 23 September 2014 undertakings were provided by the employer. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Company’s undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[4] The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410311 PR555843>
- AGLC
- Independent Education Union of Australia [2014] FWCA 6708
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 6708
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was made in good faith, if it was properly negotiated, and whether it met the standards of procedural fairness. Additionally, the Commission had to determine if the agreement contained all the required minimum terms as stipulated by the Act. The union argued that the agreement did not adequately cover all employees of the kindergarten, and there were concerns about the process through which the agreement was negotiated. The Commission also had to consider the fairness of the terms and conditions set out in the agreement.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and that the negotiation process was procedurally fair. The Commission acknowledged that while there were some minor procedural imperfections, these did not significantly impact the overall fairness of the agreement. The Commission also determined that the agreement contained all the required minimum terms and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement and ordered its registration. This ensures that the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement are legally enforceable for the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.