| [2015] FWCA 131 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Independent Education Union of Australia
(AG2014/10330)
MT LOUISA SUBURBS KINDERGARTEN & PRESCHOOL EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 14 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Mt Louisa Suburbs Kindergarten & Preschool Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Mt Louisa Suburbs Kindergarten & Preschool Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Independent Education Union of Australia.
[2] On the basis of the material before me, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] An undertaking was provided by the employer at the time of lodging the Agreement. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Company’s undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[4] The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 21 January 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE412104 PR559788>
- AGLC
- Independent Education Union of Australia [2015] FWCA 131
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 131
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement complied with the legislative requirements for enterprise agreements, including whether the agreement was in writing, whether it was made in good faith and whether it provided for a proper process for the resolution of disputes. The agreement was to be assessed against the relevant provisions of the Industrial Relations Act 2016.
The Commission found that the agreement was in writing, had been made in good faith and provided for a proper process for the resolution of disputes. The agreement contained all the required terms and conditions of employment, as well as provisions for dispute resolution and the agreement had been negotiated between the parties. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met all the legislative requirements for approval. The application was approved and the agreement was registered under the Act.
The Commission approved the agreement and ordered its registration under the Industrial Relations Act 2016. The agreement was to be in effect from the date of registration and would remain in force until terminated or varied in accordance with its terms or the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.