| [2018] FWCA 3199 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Independent Education Union of Australia
(AG2018/710)
Goondiwindi Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Collective Enterprise Agreement 2018
| Educational services | |
| Commissioner Johns | SYDNEY, 4 JUNE 2018 |
Application for approval of the Goondiwindi Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Collective Enterprise Agreement 2018.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Goondiwindi Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Collective Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Independent Education Union of Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Independent Education Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 June 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428646 PR607740>
- AGLC
- Independent Education Union of Australia [2018] FWCA 3199
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3199
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, considering the specific context of early childhood education services. It also assessed whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether there was adequate consultation and negotiation between the parties. Furthermore, the court scrutinised the classification and pay rates proposed in the agreement to ensure they were consistent with the applicable industrial awards and the principles of fairness and equity. After careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented, the court found that the agreement did not meet the required standards of procedural fairness and good faith bargaining.
The court concluded that the proposed classification and remuneration terms did not adequately reflect the skills, responsibilities, and qualifications of the employees. It also found that there had been insufficient consultation and negotiation between the parties. Consequently, the court refused to approve the agreement. The court ordered that the application be dismissed, and the proposed agreement be not approved. The court's decision was based on the evidence and arguments presented, and it emphasised the importance of fair and reasonable terms, as well as good faith bargaining, in the context of enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.