In the matter of DSHE Holdings Limited
Case
•
[2021] NSWSC 608
•28 May 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
In the matter of DSHE Holdings Limited [2021] NSWSC 608
[2021] NSWSC 608
28 May 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Federal Court, DSHE Holdings Limited sought orders to facilitate its deregistration without any intervening winding up. The company had entered into a deed of company arrangement with its creditors, and was now seeking to conclude the arrangement without a winding up. The legal issues before the court were whether the court had the power under section 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Cth) to make the orders sought and, if so, whether the orders should be granted. The court was also asked to terminate the deed of company arrangement and modify the operation of the winding up regime in relation to reporting to creditors under section 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
The court held that it did have the power to make the orders sought under section 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule. However, the court considered that the orders were not appropriate in the circumstances of this case. The court noted that the deed of company arrangement had not been approved by the requisite majority of creditors, and that the remuneration claimed by the deed administrator exceeded the total creditors’ claims. The court was of the view that these factors outweighed any potential benefits of making the orders sought. The court also noted that there was no evidence before it that the making of the orders would not prejudice the interests of creditors.
The court refused to make the orders sought and terminated the deed of company arrangement. The court made orders under section 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) modifying the operation of the winding up regime in relation to reporting to creditors.
The court held that it did have the power to make the orders sought under section 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule. However, the court considered that the orders were not appropriate in the circumstances of this case. The court noted that the deed of company arrangement had not been approved by the requisite majority of creditors, and that the remuneration claimed by the deed administrator exceeded the total creditors’ claims. The court was of the view that these factors outweighed any potential benefits of making the orders sought. The court also noted that there was no evidence before it that the making of the orders would not prejudice the interests of creditors.
The court refused to make the orders sought and terminated the deed of company arrangement. The court made orders under section 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) modifying the operation of the winding up regime in relation to reporting to creditors.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
-
Insolvency Law
Legal Concepts
-
Deed of Company Arrangement
-
Remuneration of Deed Administrator
-
Winding Up Regime
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
In the matter of Ally Fashion Pty Ltd (in liq) [2025] NSWSC 268
Cases Citing This Decision
10
In the matter of Ally Fashion Pty Ltd (in liq)
[2025] NSWSC 268
In the matter of Ally Fashion Pty Ltd (in liq)
[2025] NSWSC 268
Cases Cited
24
Statutory Material Cited
4
Baskerville v Tow.com.au Pty Ltd (In Liquidation), in the matter of Tow.com.au Pty Ltd (In Liquidation)
[2018] FCA 1069
Levy v Kum Chah
[1936] HCA 60