In the matter of Camelia Grove Operations Pty Ltd, Public Lifestyle Management Pty Ltd and 146 Henderson Street Pty Ltd in its personal capacity and in its capacity as the Trustee for 146 Henderson Street Unit..

The matter before the court involved three defendants who had taken possession of property used by companies in voluntary administration. The plaintiffs, Camelia Grove Operations Pty Ltd, Public Lifestyle Management Pty Ltd, and 146 Henderson Street Pty Ltd, sought a declaration that the defendants' actions were unlawful, an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' use of the property, and other relief. The legal issues before the court were whether section 440B applied, whether leave should be granted to the defendants to take possession of the property, and whether a declaration and injunction should be made.

The court considered whether section 440B applied to the defendants' actions and whether they had acted without the consent of the voluntary administrators or leave of the court. The court found that section 440B did apply, and that the defendants had acted without the consent of the voluntary administrators or leave of the court. The court also considered whether leave should be granted to the defendants to take possession of the property and whether a declaration and injunction should be made. The court found that leave should not be granted to the defendants to take possession of the property and that a declaration and injunction should be made in favour of the plaintiffs.

The court's final orders were that the defendants take nothing by their proceedings and that they be perpetually restrained from entering the property without the leave of the court or the consent of the voluntary administrators. The court also made a declaration that the defendants' actions were unlawful and ordered them to pay the plaintiffs' costs.