FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
In the matter of C & D Global Protection Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) ACN 104 649 167 [2007] FCA 2063
IN THE MATTER OF C & D GLOBAL PROTECTION PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATOR APPOINTED) ACN 104 649 167; DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v C & D GLOBAL PROTECTION PTY LTD ACN 104 649 167 AND OH MY PTY LTD ACN 117 619 495 T/A HERVEY BAY SECURITY
QUD 323 OF 2007
DOWSETT J
14 DECEMBER 2007
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 323 OF 2007
IN THE MATTER OF C & D GLOBAL PROTECTION PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATOR APPOINTED) ACN 104 649 167
BETWEEN:
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
PlaintiffAND:
C & D GLOBAL PROTECTION PTY LTD ACN 104 649 167
DefendantOH MY PTY LTD ACN 117 619 495 T/A HERVEY BAY SECURITY
Supporting Creditor
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
14 DECEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.C & D Global Protection Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) ACN 104 649 167 be wound up in insolvency under the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth);
2.Julie Ann Williams be appointed liquidator for the purposes of the said winding up;
3.The plaintiff’s costs of and incidental to the application be costs in the winding up. Such costs take priority in accordance with s 556(1)(b) of the Act.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 323 OF 2007
IN THE MATTER OF C & D GLOBAL PROTECTION PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATOR APPOINTED) ACN 104 649 167
BETWEEN:
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
PlaintiffAND:
C & D GLOBAL PROTECTION PTY LTD ACN 104 649 167
DefendantOH MY PTY LTD ACN 117 619 495 T/A HERVEY BAY SECURITY
Supporting Creditor
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE:
14 DECEMBER 2007
PLACE:
BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Prior to the appointment of the administrator, the affairs of this company were being conducted in a way which was calculated to create suspicion about its management. In particular, with knowledge of the Commissioner’s debt and of threatened winding up proceedings, the assets of the company were transferred in a transaction which appears not to have been at arm’s length.
I do not mean to cast doubt upon the character or professional competence of the administrator of the company, nor upon his conduct in connection with the administration. However he was appointed by the directors. In the circumstances, and given the likelihood that there will be a substantial investigation into the management of the company, the Commissioner’s preference for a liquidator other than the administrator is reasonable. In those circumstances it is better that the Commissioner’s nominee be appointed liquidator.
I order that C & D Global Protection Pty Ltd ACN104649167 (administrator appointed) be wound up in insolvency under the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the “Act”). I order that Julie Ann Williams be appointed liquidator for the purposes of the said winding up. I order that the plaintiff’s costs of and incidental to the application be costs in the winding up, and that such costs take priority in accordance with s 556(1)(b) of the Act.
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett. Associate:
Dated: 21 December 2007
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr P Cleary Solicitor for the Plaintiff Australian Taxation Office, Legal Services Branch Solicitor for the Defendant: McInness Wilson Counsel for the Supporting Creditor: The Supporting Creditor did not appear Date of Hearing: 14 December 2007 Date of Judgment: 14 December 2007
- AGLC
- In the matter of C and D Global Protection Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) ACN 104 649 167 [2007] FCA 2063
- Case
- [2007] FCA 2063
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the court had to address included whether the company was indeed insolvent, as claimed, and if so, whether the appointment of a liquidator was warranted under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The court also had to consider the application for the plaintiff's costs to be recognised as costs in the winding up, which would entitle them to priority under section 556(1)(b) of the Act.
The court, after reviewing the evidence and submissions, found that the company was indeed insolvent and that the appointment of a liquidator was appropriate. The reasoning included a detailed analysis of the company's financial records, which demonstrated an inability to pay debts as they fell due, a key indicator of insolvency under the Act. The court accepted that the plaintiff's costs were directly related to the application and necessary for the winding up, thus granting them priority as sought. The final orders included the winding up of the company, the appointment of Julie Ann Williams as liquidator, and the recognition of the plaintiff’s costs as costs in the winding up.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. C & D Global Protection Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) ACN 104 649 167 be wound up in insolvency under the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth);
2. Julie Ann Williams be appointed liquidator for the purposes of the said winding up;
3. The plaintiff’s costs of and incidental to the application be costs in the winding up. Such costs take priority in accordance with s 556(1)(b) of the Act.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: DOWSETT J
Full text does not contain this section.