In the Estate of Reisinger (No 2)

Case [2023] NTSC 27


CITATION:In the Estate of Reisinger (No 2) [2023] NTSC 27

PARTIES:IN THE ESTATE OF REISINGER

ON REFERENCE from the Registrar of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

TITLE OF COURT:  SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY

JURISDICTION:  SUPREME COURT exercising Territory Jurisdiction

FILE NO:2022-02643-SC



DELIVERED:  13 March 2023

JUDGMENT OF:  Burns J

REPRESENTATION:

Counsel:

Applicant: Eric Maher

Solicitor:

Applicant:Maher Raumteen Solicitors

Judgment category classification:    C

Judgment ID Number:  Bur2309

Number of pages:  2

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY
OF AUSTRALIA
AT DARWIN

In the Estate of Reisinger (No 2) [2023] NTSC 27
No. 2022-02643-SC

BETWEEN:

IN THE ESTATE OF REISINGER

ON REFERENCE from the Registrar of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

CORAM:    Burns J

REASONS FOR ORDERS

(Delivered 13 March 2023)

Introduction

  1. The background to this matter may be found in my earlier decision published on 9 January 2023.[1] I have now received further affidavit evidence from the applicant for probate, Oliver Anton Reisinger, and his brother Guenther Reisinger.

  2. Based on that further evidence I am now satisfied that the handwritten amendments to the will executed by the deceased on 12 October 2005 are in the deceased’s handwriting and that the signatures corresponding to those amendments are the deceased’s signature.

  3. I am further satisfied that in 2019 the deceased told others of her intention to amend her will to make greater provision for her grandchildren. I am therefore satisfied that the handwritten amendments to the deceased’s will were intended by the deceased to be alterations to her will and to embody her testamentary intentions.

  4. I therefore order that probate be granted to Oliver Anton Reisinger with regard to the will of the late Gertrude Marie Reisinger dated 12 October 2005 as subsequently altered by the deceased.

    ------------


[1]In the Estate of Reisinger [2023] NTSC 2.

Details
AGLC
In the Estate of Reisinger (No 2) [2023] NTSC 27
Case
[2023] NTSC 27
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case, In the Estate of Reisinger (No 2), was heard by Burns J in the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory, exercising its Territory jurisdiction. The matter involved a dispute over the validity of handwritten amendments to a will, which would determine the distribution of the estate of the deceased, Gertrude Marie Reisinger. The applicant for probate, Oliver Anton Reisinger, sought confirmation of the amendments to the will, which would alter the testamentary intentions of the deceased.

The primary legal issue for the court was to determine whether the handwritten amendments to the will, dated 12 October 2005, were indeed made by the deceased and whether they reflected her testamentary intentions. The court was also required to consider the credibility of the evidence presented by the applicant and his brother, Guenther Reisinger, in establishing the deceased's intentions.

The court examined the evidence provided, including affidavits from the applicant and his brother, and was satisfied that the handwritten amendments were indeed made by the deceased. The court found that the signatures corresponding to the amendments were the deceased's signature and that she had expressed her intention to make greater provision for her grandchildren in 2019. Based on this evidence, the court concluded that the amendments reflected the deceased's testamentary intentions. Consequently, the court ordered that probate be granted to Oliver Anton Reisinger in respect of the will of the late Gertrude Marie Reisinger dated 12 October 2005, as subsequently altered by the deceased.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.