Imisides v The Queen
Case
•
[1990] HCATrans 228
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Imisides v The Queen [1990] HCATrans 228
[1990] HCATrans 228
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter came before the High Court of Australia concerning an application by Mr Imisides for special leave to appeal. Mr Imisides sought to appeal against a decision of the Crown. The primary hurdle for the applicant was that his application was lodged out of time, requiring him to seek the Court's leave to proceed.
The legal issues before the Court included whether to grant an extension of time for the filing of the application for special leave to appeal. The grounds for this extension were based on alleged delays within the legal aid system, which the applicant contended were not attributable to any fault on his part. The Court also considered the adequacy of the explanation provided for the delay in lodging the application.
The Court was presented with submissions regarding the timeline of events, including the date the judgment was handed down and when a copy was requested and received. Counsel for the applicant argued that the delay was due to systemic issues and not the fault of the applicant, who was suffering the consequences. The Chief Justice noted the importance of timely access to judgments, particularly for the purposes of appeals, and questioned the adequacy of the explanation for the delay. The Court ultimately indicated that it would proceed with the application despite the initial concerns about the timeliness.
The legal issues before the Court included whether to grant an extension of time for the filing of the application for special leave to appeal. The grounds for this extension were based on alleged delays within the legal aid system, which the applicant contended were not attributable to any fault on his part. The Court also considered the adequacy of the explanation provided for the delay in lodging the application.
The Court was presented with submissions regarding the timeline of events, including the date the judgment was handed down and when a copy was requested and received. Counsel for the applicant argued that the delay was due to systemic issues and not the fault of the applicant, who was suffering the consequences. The Chief Justice noted the importance of timely access to judgments, particularly for the purposes of appeals, and questioned the adequacy of the explanation for the delay. The Court ultimately indicated that it would proceed with the application despite the initial concerns about the timeliness.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Limitation Periods
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Imisides v The Queen [1990] HCATrans 228
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0