Imbornone v R
Case
•
[2017] NSWCCA 144
•05 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144
[2017] NSWCCA 144
05 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Imbornone was charged with multiple offences including aggravated break, enter and commit serious indictable offence, reckless wounding in company, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and steal from person. He also had a charge of breach of a bond. Imbornone entered guilty pleas to all charges. The issue before the court was whether the evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that Imbornone had expressed remorse for his actions in the absence of direct evidence from him. The court considered whether untested assertions made to a third party could be relied upon and what principles applied to such statements. The relevance of Imbornone's mental illness to the sentencing exercise was also considered.
The court held that for an assertion of remorse to be considered, it needed to be more than a mere expression of regret or contrition. It needed to demonstrate a genuine understanding of the impact of the offending behaviour on the victim and a recognition of the wrongfulness of the conduct. The court found that Imbornone's assertions to a third party, while not directly from him, were relevant and could be considered if they met the required standard. The court held that the assertions demonstrated a level of remorse that was sufficient for the purposes of sentencing. The court also considered Imbornone's mental illness and its impact on his offending behaviour. The court found that while his mental illness was a mitigating factor, it did not excuse his behaviour or reduce his culpability.
The court sentenced Imbornone to a total of eight years and six months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of five years and three months. The court considered the seriousness of the offences, the level of planning and premeditation, the vulnerability of the victims, and the need for general and specific deterrence. The court also considered Imbornone's background, his mental illness, and his prospects for rehabilitation. The court held that a custodial sentence was necessary to achieve the purposes of sentencing and to protect the community.
The court held that for an assertion of remorse to be considered, it needed to be more than a mere expression of regret or contrition. It needed to demonstrate a genuine understanding of the impact of the offending behaviour on the victim and a recognition of the wrongfulness of the conduct. The court found that Imbornone's assertions to a third party, while not directly from him, were relevant and could be considered if they met the required standard. The court held that the assertions demonstrated a level of remorse that was sufficient for the purposes of sentencing. The court also considered Imbornone's mental illness and its impact on his offending behaviour. The court found that while his mental illness was a mitigating factor, it did not excuse his behaviour or reduce his culpability.
The court sentenced Imbornone to a total of eight years and six months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of five years and three months. The court considered the seriousness of the offences, the level of planning and premeditation, the vulnerability of the victims, and the need for general and specific deterrence. The court also considered Imbornone's background, his mental illness, and his prospects for rehabilitation. The court held that a custodial sentence was necessary to achieve the purposes of sentencing and to protect the community.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
Breach of Bond
-
Aggravated & Exemplary Damages
-
Actual Bodily Harm
-
Mental Illness
-
Evidence of Remorse
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144
Most Recent Citation
Environment Protection Authority v Maules Creek Coal Pty Ltd (No 4) [2025] NSWLEC 92
Cases Citing This Decision
476
Day v The King
[2023] ACTCA 39
R v Wright
[2025] NSWSC 822
R v Saliba (No 4)
[2025] NSWSC 659
Cases Cited
14
Statutory Material Cited
12
Van Zwam v R
[2017] NSWCCA 127
R v Harrison
[2001] NSWCCA 79
R v Qutami
[2001] NSWCCA 353