ICTA Investments Pty. Ltd. trading as Jolly Roger & Anor. v. GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. & Anor.(No. 2)
Case
•
[2006] NSWCA 341
•7 December 2006
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
ICTA Investments Pty. Ltd. trading as Jolly Roger and Anor. v GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. and Anor.(No. 2) [2006] NSWCA 341
[2006] NSWCA 341
7 December 2006
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of ICTA Investments Pty. Ltd. trading as Jolly Roger & Anor. v. GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. & Anor.(No. 2) concerned an appeal to the Supreme Court of New South Wales following a decision in the Local Court. The dispute involved ICTA Investments Pty. Ltd. (the First Appellant) and its related entity (the Second Appellant), who were appealing against orders made by Magistrate Huber. GE Commercial Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. (the First Respondent) was the party against whom the appeal was brought.
The primary legal issue before the Supreme Court was whether the orders made by Magistrate Huber on 30 November 2004 in Local Court Proceedings 5582/03 were correct. The Appellants sought to have these orders set aside and judgment entered in their favour. The Court was required to determine the merits of the Appellants' case against the First Respondent.
The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of Magistrate Huber. In lieu of those orders, the Supreme Court entered judgment in favour of the First Appellant for the sum of $2,067.52, plus interest of $741.87, and awarded costs. Judgment was also entered in favour of the Second Appellant, with costs. The First Respondent was ordered to pay the Appellants' costs for the Supreme Court proceedings and the costs of the appeal, including the application for leave to appeal.
The primary legal issue before the Supreme Court was whether the orders made by Magistrate Huber on 30 November 2004 in Local Court Proceedings 5582/03 were correct. The Appellants sought to have these orders set aside and judgment entered in their favour. The Court was required to determine the merits of the Appellants' case against the First Respondent.
The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of Magistrate Huber. In lieu of those orders, the Supreme Court entered judgment in favour of the First Appellant for the sum of $2,067.52, plus interest of $741.87, and awarded costs. Judgment was also entered in favour of the Second Appellant, with costs. The First Respondent was ordered to pay the Appellants' costs for the Supreme Court proceedings and the costs of the appeal, including the application for leave to appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0