| [2018] FWCA 4870 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Icon Co (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Icon Co
(AG2018/1968)
Icon Co (Vic) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 17 AUGUST 2018 |
Application for variation of the Icon Co (Vic) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Icon Co (Vic) Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made by Icon Co (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Icon Co pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 17 August 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE420404 PR610229>
- AGLC
- Icon Co (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Icon Co [2018] FWCA 4870
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 4870
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed changes were fair and reasonable, and if the application met the statutory criteria for a variation as outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission had to assess whether the changes were necessary for the company to remain competitive, whether they were consistent with the principles of the National Employment Standards, and whether they maintained a balance of fairness between the parties.
In its decision, the Commission carefully weighed the evidence presented by both parties. It determined that the proposed changes were necessary to maintain the company's economic viability and competitiveness in a challenging market. The Commission found that the changes were fair and reasonable, as they did not overly disadvantage the employees and were consistent with broader industry trends. The application was thus approved, with specific provisions incorporated into the revised Enterprise Agreement.
The final orders of the Commission included the variation of certain sections of the Enterprise Agreement to reflect the changes proposed by the company. The new provisions were designed to be fair and reasonable, balancing the interests of both the employer and the employees. The Commission also set out a detailed timeline for the implementation of the changes and outlined the process for any future disputes arising from the revised agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.