Iaconi & Anor and Iaconi
Case
•
[2011] FamCA 459
•1 April 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Iaconi & Anor and Iaconi [2011] FamCA 459
[2011] FamCA 459
1 April 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Iaconi & Anor and Iaconi*, heard before Cronin J, the dispute concerned applications made by the parties. The specific nature of the underlying dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but the orders indicate ongoing proceedings involving a husband and wife, and potentially other parties represented by "Anor".
The court was required to determine several matters, including the adjournment of outstanding applications, the payment of costs for the day, and the timeline for the husband to file and serve any applications seeking interim orders and supporting affidavits. The court also considered whether the wife or her solicitor should be responsible for the costs awarded.
Cronin J ordered that all outstanding applications be adjourned to 11 April 2011. The wife was ordered to pay the husband's costs of the day, fixed at $1565, with the question of whether the wife or her solicitor should bear these costs adjourned to the return date. The husband was directed to file and serve any application for interim orders and supporting affidavits by 7 April 2011. The court also certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel for the proceedings.
The court was required to determine several matters, including the adjournment of outstanding applications, the payment of costs for the day, and the timeline for the husband to file and serve any applications seeking interim orders and supporting affidavits. The court also considered whether the wife or her solicitor should be responsible for the costs awarded.
Cronin J ordered that all outstanding applications be adjourned to 11 April 2011. The wife was ordered to pay the husband's costs of the day, fixed at $1565, with the question of whether the wife or her solicitor should bear these costs adjourned to the return date. The husband was directed to file and serve any application for interim orders and supporting affidavits by 7 April 2011. The court also certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel for the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1