IABH and HRBH

The case of *IABH and HRBH* concerned an application by the wife for leave to adduce further evidence in Family Court proceedings. The husband objected to this application, relying on section 67 of the *Evidence Act 1995* (Cth). The matter came before District Court Judge Faulks DCJ.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the husband's objections to the wife's application to adduce further evidence were valid under section 67 of the *Evidence Act 1995*. This section deals with the admissibility of evidence in legal proceedings.

Judge Faulks DCJ dismissed the husband's objections. While the specific reasoning is not detailed in the provided text, the outcome indicates that the court found the wife's application to adduce further evidence to be permissible, notwithstanding the husband's objections.

The court ordered that the husband's objections to the wife's application pursuant to section 67 of the *Evidence Act 1995* be dismissed.