i4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 1862


[2022] FWCA 1862

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

i4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd

(AG2022/1593)

I4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER YILMAZ

MELBOURNE, 7 JUNE 2022

Application for approval of the i4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the i4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by i4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 14 June 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 June 2026.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516194  PR742396>

Details
AGLC
i4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 1862
Case
[2022] FWCA 1862
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the applicant, i4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd, sought approval of the i4 Design and Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021. The applicant is an engineering and construction company, while the respondents were the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) and the United Workers Union (UWU). The dispute involved the terms and conditions of employment for workers in the engineering and construction industry.

The main legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether the agreement had been fairly negotiated and contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement would provide for a fair and efficient workplace and promote high-quality jobs.

The Commission found that the agreement had been fairly negotiated and contained the minimum terms and conditions required by law. The agreement provided for a fair and efficient workplace and promoted high-quality jobs. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The modifications included changes to the provisions relating to casual loading, shift differentials, and overtime. The Commission also made a declaration that the agreement would apply to all employees of the applicant who were not already covered by another enterprise agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.