DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Hy-Tec Industries (Victoria) Pty Ltd
(AG2017/4540)

HY-TEC INDUSTRIES AND TWU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (VICTORIA) 2017

Road transport industry
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL	MELBOURNE, 18 JANUARY 2018

Application for approval of the Hy-Tec Industries and TWU Enterprise Agreement (Victoria) 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Hy-Tec Industries and TWU Enterprise Agreement (Victoria) 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Hy-Tec Industries (Victoria) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 18 January 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 25 January 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 August 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Hy-Tec Industries (Victoria) Pty Ltd was before the Fair Work Commission where the applicant sought approval for an enterprise agreement. The dispute involved the proposed agreement between Hy-Tec Industries and the Transport Workers Union. The central issue was whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant argued that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and was fair and reasonable. The Transport Workers Union supported the application, asserting that the agreement provided adequate benefits and protections for the employees. The respondent, however, raised concerns about certain provisions, particularly regarding the classification and remuneration of employees.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for the proper classification of employees, adequate remuneration, and if it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to determine if the agreement met the criteria for approval, including whether it provided for a fair and reasonable rate of pay, adequate working conditions, and did not unfairly discriminate against any class of employee. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, taking into account the overall fairness and reasonableness of the provisions.

In its decision, the Commission considered the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that while the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable rate of pay and adequate working conditions, certain provisions relating to employee classification were not sufficiently clear and precise. The Commission emphasised the importance of clarity in agreements to ensure that employees understood their rights and obligations. After reviewing the evidence and submissions, the Commission concluded that the agreement, with some modifications, was fair and reasonable and in the best interests of the employees. The Commission ordered that the agreement be approved with the condition that specific provisions regarding employee classification be amended to ensure clarity and precision.

The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the enterprise agreement, subject to the specified modifications to the classification provisions. The Commission directed the parties to work together to implement the agreed changes within a specified timeframe. This decision underscores the importance of clear and precise language in enterprise agreements to ensure they meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act and adequately protect employee interests.

Hy-Tec Industries (Victoria) Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established