[2015] FWC 517
DECISION
| Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 |
Sch. 3, Item 15 - Application by agreement to terminate collective agreement-based
transitional instrument
Hy-Tec Industries (Queensland) Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8433)
Building, metal and civil construction industries
| COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 20 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for termination of the Enterprise Collective Agreement - BM Webb Holdings Pty
Ltd and Quarry Employees of BM Webb Holdings Pty Ltd.
[1] On 4 December 2014, Hy-Tec Industries (Queensland) Pty Ltd (“the Employer”)
filed an application pursuant to Sch. 3, Item 15 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and
Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (“the TPCA Act”) to terminate the BM Webb Holdings
Pty Ltd and Quarry Employees of BM Webb Holdings Pty Ltd. (“the Agreement”).
The TPCA Act sets out that Subdivision C of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act
(“the Act”) applies.
Section 223 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an agreement to be
terminated pursuant to s.222 of the Act:
“223 When FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement
If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under
section 222, FWC must approve the termination if:
(a) FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with
subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to
decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and
(b) FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with
whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement
to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and
(c) FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the
employees have not agreed to the termination; and
[2015] FWC 517
(d) FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into
account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any)
covered by the agreement.”
Mark Anthony Collins, Quarry Manager of the Applicant provided a statutory declaration
which outlined the process taken for the employees to approve the termination of the Agreement.
[4] The Applicant provided further material as to the information provided to the employees prior to
the vote.
[5] On the information provided, there are no other reasonable grounds for considering that the
employees have not agreed to the termination. There are no employee organisations that are covered
by the Agreement.
[6] Having considered the requirements set out in s.223 of the Act, the termination of the Agreement is
approved. In accordance with s.224 of the Act, the termination of the Agreement will operate from the
date of this Decision.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR560272 >
- AGLC
- Hy-Tec Industries (Queensland) Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 517
- Case
- [2015] FWC 517
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the application to terminate the transitional instrument was in compliance with the relevant provisions of Schedule 3, Item 15 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess whether the employer had followed the correct procedural steps and whether the termination was justified under the circumstances. Additionally, the court had to consider the impact of the termination on the employees and the broader implications for industrial relations.
The Commission examined the procedural aspects of the application and the content of the transitional instrument. Deputy President Ryan found that the employer had not strictly adhered to the procedural requirements outlined in the Act. The employer's failure to provide adequate notice and opportunity for consultation with the union before submitting the application was deemed significant. Furthermore, the Commission held that the employer had not demonstrated a compelling justification for the termination. The decision highlighted the importance of following proper procedures and ensuring that any termination of a collective agreement-based transitional instrument is done in a manner that is fair and reasonable.
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the application to terminate the transitional instrument. The Commission's decision underscored the need for employers to comply with statutory requirements and engage in good faith negotiations with employee representatives. The ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of procedural fairness and the necessity of substantiating any claims of justification for terminating such agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.