Huynh v The King

Case

[2024] NSWCCA 61

06 May 2024


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Huynh v The King [2024] NSWCCA 61 [2024] NSWCCA 61 06 May 2024

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Huynh v The King involves an appeal against a sentence passed by a sentencing judge in New South Wales. The appellant, Huynh, argued that the sentencing judge made an arithmetical error in calculating the commencement date of the sentence, which resulted in an incorrect calculation of the pre-sentence custody credit. Huynh further contended that the sentencing judge failed to exercise their discretion properly under section 24 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) in determining the date from which the sentence should commence.

The primary legal issues the court had to decide were whether the sentencing judge made an arithmetical error in calculating the commencement date of the sentence and whether the sentencing judge exercised their discretion correctly in determining the date from which the sentence should commence, taking into account the appellant's pre-sentence custody. The court had to consider whether the sentencing judge overlooked the appellant's pre-sentence custody when determining the date from which the sentence should commence.

The court found that the sentencing judge had indeed made an arithmetical error in calculating the commencement date of the sentence. However, the court also held that the sentencing judge did not err in their exercise of discretion in determining the date from which the sentence should commence. The court noted that the sentencing judge had considered the appellant's pre-sentence custody when determining the date from which the sentence should commence, and that the appellant's argument that the sentencing judge failed to take into account all of their pre-sentence custody was not substantiated. The court found that the sentencing judge had exercised their discretion correctly and dismissed the appeal against sentence.

The court did not make any further orders in relation to the appeal. The court held that the appeal against sentence was dismissed, and that the original sentence passed by the sentencing judge remained in place.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Sentencing

  • Discretion of Sentencing Judge

  • Pre-sentence Custody

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
PB v The King [2025] NSWCCA 14

Cases Citing This Decision

8

R v Rae (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 713
PB v The King [2025] NSWCCA 14
Cases Cited

13

Statutory Material Cited

5

R v Karageorge [1999] NSWCCA 213
Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37