Huynh v Inner West Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1538


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Huynh v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1538
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 28 September 2018
Date of orders: 10 October 2018
Decision date: 10 October 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Van Huynh (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant)
S Turner, Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/72646
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. DA201700551 and to rely upon the following amended plans and documents, copies of which are behind Annexure “A”:

Plan, Revision and Issue No.

Plan Name/ Certificate

Type

Date Issued

Prepared by

DA-02 Revision E

Ground Floor Plan

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

DA-03 Revision E

First Floor Plan

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

DA-04 Revision E

Roof Plan

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

DA-05 Revision E

East & West Elevations

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

DA-06 Revision E

North & South Elevations

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

DA-07 Revision E

Sections

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

DA-08 Revision E

Schedule of Colours and Finishes

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

DA-09 Revision E

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

DA-11 Revision E

Subdivision and Calculations

26.9.2018

Fortey + Grant Architecture

L01 E

Landscape Plan

17.9.2018

Hortus Design

Basix Certificate No. 867494M_02

Proposed Lot 122

27.9.2018

Planning Approvals

Basix Certificate No. 867494M_02

Proposed Lot 122A

27.9.2018

Planning Approvals

  1. The applicant is to pay the Council's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount of $10,700 GST exclusive in full and final payment within 28 days.

  2. The Applicant’s cl4.6 written request to vary the development control for FSR set out in Clause 4.4 of the Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 is upheld.

  3. The appeal is upheld.

  4. Development Application No. DA201700551 to demolish the existing single storey dwelling, subdivision of land into 2 Torrens Title allotments, construct a new 2 storey dwelling house on each allotment at 124 Victoria Street, Dulwich Hill be approved subject to the conditions which are behind Annexure ‘B’.

……………………….

Michael Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (Plans)

Annexure B (C)

Amendments

15 October 2018 - Upload correct judgment with amendments.

Details
AGLC
Huynh v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1538
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1538
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Huynh v Inner West Council was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute involved a property owner, Mr Huynh, and the Inner West Council over the Council's decision to refuse a development application concerning the construction of a carport on his property. Mr Huynh sought to challenge the Council's decision, arguing that it was unreasonable and not in accordance with relevant planning laws and policies.

The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the Council's decision was lawful, rational, and procedurally fair, and whether there was any error in the application of the planning laws and policies. The Court had to consider the statutory framework governing development applications, the Local Environment Plan, and the procedural fairness principles that applied to the decision-making process.

The Court found that the Council's decision was indeed unreasonable and not in accordance with the planning laws and policies. The Court held that the Council had failed to properly consider a key policy and had made an error in its assessment of the application. Furthermore, the Court found that the decision-making process was flawed due to a failure to provide adequate reasons for the decision, which breached the principles of procedural fairness. Consequently, the Court quashed the Council's decision and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the law.

ORDERS:
The Court quashed the Council's decision and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the law. The Council was required to properly consider the relevant planning policies and provide adequate reasons for its decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.