Hussain v Haynoum Developments Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2014] NSWCA 173
•30 May 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hussain v Haynoum Developments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 173
[2014] NSWCA 173
30 May 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Hussain v Haynoum Developments Pty Ltd*, the applicant sought a stay of proceedings in the District Court pending the determination of a summons seeking leave to appeal. The respondent was Haynoum Developments Pty Ltd.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether an application for a stay of proceedings could be competently made in the absence of a filed originating process seeking leave to appeal. The court was also required to consider the principles governing appellate review of discretionary interlocutory decisions concerning matters of practice and procedure.
McColl JA determined that the application for a stay was not competent because the originating process seeking leave to appeal had not been filed. The court applied the principles that govern appellate review of discretionary interlocutory decisions, noting that such decisions are not lightly interfered with. The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated a sufficient basis to warrant the grant of a stay.
The application for a stay of proceedings was refused.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether an application for a stay of proceedings could be competently made in the absence of a filed originating process seeking leave to appeal. The court was also required to consider the principles governing appellate review of discretionary interlocutory decisions concerning matters of practice and procedure.
McColl JA determined that the application for a stay was not competent because the originating process seeking leave to appeal had not been filed. The court applied the principles that govern appellate review of discretionary interlocutory decisions, noting that such decisions are not lightly interfered with. The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated a sufficient basis to warrant the grant of a stay.
The application for a stay of proceedings was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Hendricks v El Dik (No 5) [2016] ACTSC 302
Cases Citing This Decision
8
National Australia Bank Ltd v Charlton; Charlton v The General Manager, NSW Rural Assistance Authority (No 2)
[2018] NSWSC 969
Iacovone v Raftos
[2016] NSWSC 502
Shafik v Makary
[2015] NZHC 2194
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
5
Hans Pet Constructions Pty Ltd v Cassar
[2009] NSWCA 230
Legal Services Commissioner v Baker (No 1)
[2005] QCA 482
Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd
[2001] NSWCA 274