Hussain & Anor v Sok Kheng & Anor
Case
•
[2015] ACTCA 42
•19 August 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hussain & Anor v Sok Kheng & Anor [2015] ACTCA 42
[2015] ACTCA 42
19 August 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia from an interlocutory judgment of the Court of Appeal. The applicants, Hussain and another, sought leave to appeal against a decision made by the Court of Appeal, the details of which are not specified in the provided text. The respondents were Sok Kheng and another.
The central legal issue before the High Court was whether the applicants should be granted leave to appeal from the interlocutory decision of the Court of Appeal. The nature of the interlocutory judgment and the grounds upon which leave to appeal was sought are not detailed in the provided text.
The High Court, presided over by Robinson AJ, considered the application for leave to appeal. No specific reasoning or legal principles applied by the Court in relation to the substantive appeal are discernible from the provided text.
The application for leave to appeal was stood over to a date to be fixed.
The central legal issue before the High Court was whether the applicants should be granted leave to appeal from the interlocutory decision of the Court of Appeal. The nature of the interlocutory judgment and the grounds upon which leave to appeal was sought are not detailed in the provided text.
The High Court, presided over by Robinson AJ, considered the application for leave to appeal. No specific reasoning or legal principles applied by the Court in relation to the substantive appeal are discernible from the provided text.
The application for leave to appeal was stood over to a date to be fixed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Hussain v Ngep (No 3) [2015] ACTCA 50
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (No 11)
[2023] ACTCA 16
Endresz v Commonwealth of Australia
[2020] ACTCA 48
Legal Practitioner v Council of the Law Society of the ACT
[2016] ACTCA 46
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
Davey v Herbst (No 2)
[2012] ACTCA 19
Twining v Curtis
[2014] ACTCA 19
Twining v Curtis
[2014] ACTCA 19