Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd T/A Panorama Coaches

Case [2022] FWCA 1394


[2022] FWCA 1394

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd T/A Panorama Coaches

(AG2022/1070)

Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022

Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE

MELBOURNE, 27 APRIL 2022

Application for approval of the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). It has been made by Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd trading as Panorama Coaches (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided a written undertaking. A copy of the undertaking is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertaking referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. I observe that the following clauses are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 6.4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES:

•          Clause 12.3(e) and clause 7 which deal with casual conversion;

•Clauses 29.1(c), 29.1(d) and 29.3 concerning the provision of evidence in support of taking personal leave;

•          Clause 29.2(a) which deals with the notification of absence for sick leave; and

•          Clause 29.2(b) regarding the notification of absence for carer’s leave.

  1. The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. Pursuant to s 185(3)(b) of the Act, I consider it fair in all the circumstances to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.

  1. The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 4 May 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 May 2026.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE515778  PR740619>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd T/A Panorama Coaches [2022] FWCA 1394
Case
[2022] FWCA 1394
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd, trading as Panorama Coaches, and various employees represented by the Transport Workers Union of Australia. The dispute centred on the application for approval of the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022 under the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was lodged with the Fair Work Commission (FWC), and subsequently, a hearing was held. The employees raised concerns about the fairness and adequacy of the proposed agreement, particularly regarding pay rates and conditions.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was fair and whether the appropriate consultation process was followed. The Transport Workers Union of Australia argued that the proposed agreement did not adequately address the employees' needs and that the consultation process was insufficient.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was fair and met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. The Commission acknowledged the employees' concerns but concluded that the agreement provided a balanced outcome that took into account the employer's financial position and the employees' needs. The Commission also found that the consultation process was appropriate and that the employer had made reasonable efforts to engage with the employees. Therefore, the application for approval of the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022 was granted.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022, thereby resolving the dispute between Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd and the Transport Workers Union of Australia. The decision highlights the importance of balancing the interests of both employers and employees in the context of enterprise agreements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.