| [2022] FWCA 1394 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd T/A Panorama Coaches
(AG2022/1070)
Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE | MELBOURNE, 27 APRIL 2022 |
Application for approval of the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). It has been made by Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd trading as Panorama Coaches (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided a written undertaking. A copy of the undertaking is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertaking referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
I observe that the following clauses are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 6.4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES:
• Clause 12.3(e) and clause 7 which deal with casual conversion;
•Clauses 29.1(c), 29.1(d) and 29.3 concerning the provision of evidence in support of taking personal leave;
• Clause 29.2(a) which deals with the notification of absence for sick leave; and
• Clause 29.2(b) regarding the notification of absence for carer’s leave.
The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. Pursuant to s 185(3)(b) of the Act, I consider it fair in all the circumstances to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 4 May 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 May 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515778 PR740619>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd T/A Panorama Coaches [2022] FWCA 1394
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1394
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was fair and whether the appropriate consultation process was followed. The Transport Workers Union of Australia argued that the proposed agreement did not adequately address the employees' needs and that the consultation process was insufficient.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was fair and met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. The Commission acknowledged the employees' concerns but concluded that the agreement provided a balanced outcome that took into account the employer's financial position and the employees' needs. The Commission also found that the consultation process was appropriate and that the employer had made reasonable efforts to engage with the employees. Therefore, the application for approval of the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022 was granted.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Panorama Coaches Enterprise Agreement 2022, thereby resolving the dispute between Hurstbridge Bus & Coach Pty Ltd and the Transport Workers Union of Australia. The decision highlights the importance of balancing the interests of both employers and employees in the context of enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.