Hull v Smith
Case
•
[2012] NSWCA 183
•18 June 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hull v Smith [2012] NSWCA 183
[2012] NSWCA 183
18 June 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Hull v Smith*, the applicant sought an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal. The respondent opposed the application. The matter came before Young AJA.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had demonstrated that the proposed appeal had reasonable prospects of success, a necessary prerequisite for granting an extension of time to appeal.
Young AJA found that the applicant had failed to establish that the appeal had any reasonable prospects of success. His Honour concluded that the case did not raise any matter of principle that would warrant the granting of an extension of time. Consequently, the motion for an extension of time was dismissed with costs.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had demonstrated that the proposed appeal had reasonable prospects of success, a necessary prerequisite for granting an extension of time to appeal.
Young AJA found that the applicant had failed to establish that the appeal had any reasonable prospects of success. His Honour concluded that the case did not raise any matter of principle that would warrant the granting of an extension of time. Consequently, the motion for an extension of time was dismissed with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Limitation Periods
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hull v Smith [2012] NSWCA 183
Most Recent Citation
Morier v Liem [2016] NSWSC 582