| [2016] FWCA 9098 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Huhtamaki Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2016/6637)
HUHTAMAKI AUSTRALIA PTY LTD - WINDSOR SITE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Graphic Arts | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 19 DECEMBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the Huhtamaki Australia Pty Ltd - Windsor Site Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Huhtamaki Australia Pty Ltd - Windsor Site Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Huhtamaki Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 December 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE422750 PR588735>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Huhtamaki Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 9098
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 9098
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that required resolution involved whether the agreement correctly classified the employees and if the application process adhered to the necessary legal requirements. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the agreement met the standards set by the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions.
The Fair Work Commission evaluated the evidence presented and determined that the application for approval of the agreement was valid. The Commission found that the classification of employees was correctly handled and that the agreement met the necessary standards for approval. The Commission noted that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms, and it did not disadvantage any employees. As a result, the Commission approved the application, allowing the agreement to come into effect.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.