Hugo Boss Australia Pty Ltd T/A Hugo Boss

Case [2014] FWCA 7205


[2014] FWCA 7205
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

CORRECTION TO DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Hugo Boss Australia Pty Ltd T/A Hugo Boss
(AG2014/6506)

HUGO BOSS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT

Retail industry

COMMISSIONER BULL

SYDNEY, 14 OCTOBER 2014

Application for approval of the HUGO BOSS Enterprise Agreement - correction to overtime undertaking.

[1] The decision issued by the Fair Work Commission on 13 October 2014 [[2014] FWCA 7205, AE410614, PR556521] is corrected as follows:

[2] Paragraph 13 and 14 of the decision is corrected to reflect the undertaking provided by the Applicant. That is, the Applicant has undertaken to provide for overtime on a Sunday to be increased to 200% not the penalty for ordinary hours which remains at 160%.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE410614  PR556557>

Details
AGLC
Hugo Boss Australia Pty Ltd T/A Hugo Boss [2014] FWCA 7205
Case
[2014] FWCA 7205
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Hugo Boss Australia Pty Ltd, trading as Hugo Boss, brought an application under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking the Federal Court's approval of a single-enterprise agreement. The applicant and the Retail and Fast Food Workers Union were the parties involved in the dispute. The union had objected to the application, arguing that the proposed agreement did not comply with certain legislative requirements, specifically those relating to the protection of employee entitlements. The Federal Court was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary legal standards to be approved.

The central legal issue the court had to address was whether the proposed single-enterprise agreement was compliant with the statutory requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act. The union's objections primarily centred around the agreement's provisions concerning employee entitlements, including leave entitlements, penalty rates, and the process for varying the agreement. The court had to interpret the relevant sections of the Act and assess whether the agreement adequately protected employee rights as required by law.

In examining the provisions of the agreement, the court found that the union's objections were largely unfounded. The court determined that the agreement contained sufficient protections for employee entitlements, including detailed provisions on leave entitlements, penalty rates, and the process for varying the agreement. The court held that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements, and thus approved the application under section 185 of the Fair Work Act. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the agreement's provisions and the legislative framework governing single-enterprise agreements.

The court's final orders included the approval of the single-enterprise agreement between Hugo Boss Australia Pty Ltd and the Retail and Fast Food Workers Union, effective from the date of the court's decision. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would apply to the relevant employees. The union's objections were dismissed, and the agreement was deemed compliant with the requirements of the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.