Huffman and Gorman (No 3)

In *Huffman and Gorman (No 3)*, Hannam J of the Family Court of Australia considered an objection raised by the mother concerning specific paragraphs within an affidavit filed by the father. The dispute centred on the admissibility of evidence contained within these paragraphs of the father's affidavit.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether paragraphs 48 to 98 of the father's affidavit, filed on 23 September 2014, were admissible in the proceedings. This required the court to consider the rules of evidence and their application in family law matters, particularly concerning the content and form of affidavits.

Hannam J dismissed the mother's objection. While the specific reasoning is not detailed in the provided text, the decision indicates that the court found the contested paragraphs of the father's affidavit to be admissible, notwithstanding the mother's objections. The court's order reflects a determination that the evidence presented in those paragraphs met the necessary evidentiary standards for inclusion in the proceedings.