Hsu (Migration)
Case
•
[2017] AATA 1702
•5 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hsu (Migration) [2017] AATA 1702
[2017] AATA 1702
5 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Hsu, sought review of a decision concerning a Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa, Subclass 820 (Spouse). The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) was the forum for this review.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it possessed jurisdiction to hear the applicant's appeal, given that the prescribed fee for the application was paid outside the stipulated timeframe.
The Tribunal determined that it lacked jurisdiction because the applicant's payment of the prescribed fee on 30 June 2017 occurred after the prescribed period for making the application, which concluded on 23 June 2017. Consequently, the application for review was deemed invalid.
The Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction in this matter.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it possessed jurisdiction to hear the applicant's appeal, given that the prescribed fee for the application was paid outside the stipulated timeframe.
The Tribunal determined that it lacked jurisdiction because the applicant's payment of the prescribed fee on 30 June 2017 occurred after the prescribed period for making the application, which concluded on 23 June 2017. Consequently, the application for review was deemed invalid.
The Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hsu (Migration) [2017] AATA 1702
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
[2007] HCA 26
Grey v Minister for Immigration
[2018] FCCA 1564
Kirk v MIMA
[1998] FCA 1174