>
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Hornsby Shire Council v Gallagher [2003] NSWLEC 109 PARTIES: APPLICANT:
RESPONDENT:
Hornsby Shire Council
Michael Patrick GallagherFILE NUMBER(S): 40763 of 2002 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations :- declaratory orders - relief - unlawful erection of temporary structure on land
LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 s 68(1) CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 01/04/2003 EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :
04/01/2003LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT:
APPLICANT:
Mr P M Jackson (solicitor)
SOLICITORS:
Pike Pike & Fenwick
In person
SOLICITORS:
N/A
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
40763 of 2002
1 April 2003Lloyd J
- Applicant
- Respondent
HIS HONOUR:
1 In this case the applicant, Hornsby Shire Council (“the council”), seeks relief by way of declaration and injunction in relation to a breach of s 68(1) of the Local Government Act 1993.
2 The evidence established that on four days, namely 26 September 2002, 28 September 2002, 14 October 2002 and 21 October 2002 the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, participated in the erection of a tent on land known as Hornsby Mall at Florence Street, Hornsby.
3 A tent is a temporary structure as defined in the dictionary to the Local Government Act 1993. Section 68(1) of that Act provides:
- 68 What activities, generally, require the approval of the council?
(1) A person may carry out an activity specified in the following Table only with the prior approval of the council, except in so far as this Act, the regulations or a local policy adopted under Part 3 allows the activity to be carried out without that approval.
4 Part A of the table to s 68 is headed “Structures or places of public entertainment” and relevantly includes item 2: “[i]nstall a temporary structure on land”.
5 The evidence also shows that the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, erected a tent, or at least participated in the erection of a tent, on 24 October 2002 and 26 October 2002, in addition to the dates noted above.
6 There is no reason to doubt any of that evidence. The evidence also shows that no approval has been granted by the council for the erection or installation of a tent or any other temporary structure on land known as Hornsby Mall located at Florence Street, Hornsby.
7 It follows that there being no discretionary matters put in opposition to the orders being sought, the relief claimed in paras 1, 2 and 3 of the application will be granted.
8 I should note that Mr M P Gallagher appeared and represented himself assisted by a “McKenzie friend”, Mr M McClure. During the course of his cross-examination the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, decided to no longer participate in the proceedings and walked out. I note that as a consequence nothing has been put to me in opposition to the orders now sought.
9 The formal orders of the Court are as set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the Class 4 application.
I hereby certify that the preceding 9 paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment herein of the Honourable Mr Justice Lloyd
Associate
- AGLC
- Hornsby Shire Council v Gallagher [2003] NSWLEC 109
- Case
- [2003] NSWLEC 109
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue the court had to resolve was whether Mr Gallagher's actions constituted a breach of the statutory requirement for approval to install a temporary structure on council land. The court had to consider the definition of a temporary structure as per the dictionary of the Local Government Act 1993 and the specific requirements outlined in section 68(1) of the Act. The court also had to determine whether the council's application for relief was justified given the undisputed evidence of the respondent's actions.
The court found that the evidence presented clearly demonstrated that Mr Gallagher had erected a tent on council land on multiple occasions without the requisite approval. Given that no discretionary matters were presented in opposition to the council's application, the court granted the relief as sought. Notably, Mr Gallagher chose not to participate in the proceedings after some cross-examination, leading to no opposition to the orders sought. The court subsequently issued formal orders in line with the council's application, effectively declaring the unlawful nature of Mr Gallagher's actions and mandating appropriate relief.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.