Hornsby Shire Council v Gallagher

Case [2003] NSWLEC 109


>

Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Hornsby Shire Council v Gallagher [2003] NSWLEC 109
PARTIES:

APPLICANT:
Hornsby Shire Council

RESPONDENT:
Michael Patrick Gallagher
FILE NUMBER(S): 40763 of 2002
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations :- declaratory orders - relief - unlawful erection of temporary structure on land
LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 s 68(1)
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 01/04/2003
EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :

04/01/2003
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANT:
Mr P M Jackson (solicitor)
SOLICITORS:
Pike Pike & Fenwick

RESPONDENT:
In person
SOLICITORS:
N/A


JUDGMENT:

- 2 -

IN THE LAND AND


ENVIRONMENT COURT


OF NEW SOUTH WALES

                          40763 of 2002

                          Lloyd J

                          1 April 2003
HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL
                                  Applicant
      v
MICHAEL PATRICK GALLAGHER
                                  Respondent
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT

HIS HONOUR:


1 In this case the applicant, Hornsby Shire Council (“the council”), seeks relief by way of declaration and injunction in relation to a breach of s 68(1) of the Local Government Act 1993.


2 The evidence established that on four days, namely 26 September 2002, 28 September 2002, 14 October 2002 and 21 October 2002 the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, participated in the erection of a tent on land known as Hornsby Mall at Florence Street, Hornsby.


3 A tent is a temporary structure as defined in the dictionary to the Local Government Act 1993. Section 68(1) of that Act provides:

          68 What activities, generally, require the approval of the council?
          (1) A person may carry out an activity specified in the following Table only with the prior approval of the council, except in so far as this Act, the regulations or a local policy adopted under Part 3 allows the activity to be carried out without that approval.

4 Part A of the table to s 68 is headed “Structures or places of public entertainment” and relevantly includes item 2: [i]nstall a temporary structure on land”.


5 The evidence also shows that the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, erected a tent, or at least participated in the erection of a tent, on 24 October 2002 and 26 October 2002, in addition to the dates noted above.


6 There is no reason to doubt any of that evidence. The evidence also shows that no approval has been granted by the council for the erection or installation of a tent or any other temporary structure on land known as Hornsby Mall located at Florence Street, Hornsby.


7 It follows that there being no discretionary matters put in opposition to the orders being sought, the relief claimed in paras 1, 2 and 3 of the application will be granted.


8 I should note that Mr M P Gallagher appeared and represented himself assisted by a “McKenzie friend”, Mr M McClure. During the course of his cross-examination the respondent, Mr M P Gallagher, decided to no longer participate in the proceedings and walked out. I note that as a consequence nothing has been put to me in opposition to the orders now sought.


9 The formal orders of the Court are as set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the Class 4 application.

              I hereby certify that the preceding 9 paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment herein of the Honourable Mr Justice Lloyd

              Associate

      **********
Details
AGLC
Hornsby Shire Council v Gallagher [2003] NSWLEC 109
Case
[2003] NSWLEC 109
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Hornsby Shire Council v Gallagher, the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales was asked to address the application brought by the Hornsby Shire Council against Michael Patrick Gallagher. The council sought declaratory and injunctive relief, asserting that Mr Gallagher had unlawfully erected a tent on the Hornsby Mall at Florence Street, Hornsby, on several occasions without obtaining the necessary approval from the council as required by section 68(1) of the Local Government Act 1993.

The key legal issue the court had to resolve was whether Mr Gallagher's actions constituted a breach of the statutory requirement for approval to install a temporary structure on council land. The court had to consider the definition of a temporary structure as per the dictionary of the Local Government Act 1993 and the specific requirements outlined in section 68(1) of the Act. The court also had to determine whether the council's application for relief was justified given the undisputed evidence of the respondent's actions.

The court found that the evidence presented clearly demonstrated that Mr Gallagher had erected a tent on council land on multiple occasions without the requisite approval. Given that no discretionary matters were presented in opposition to the council's application, the court granted the relief as sought. Notably, Mr Gallagher chose not to participate in the proceedings after some cross-examination, leading to no opposition to the orders sought. The court subsequently issued formal orders in line with the council's application, effectively declaring the unlawful nature of Mr Gallagher's actions and mandating appropriate relief.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.