| [2018] FWCA 6588 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Holmes Nominees (Aust) Pty Ltd T/A Aus Pits
(AG2018/2295)
Holmes Nominees (Aust) Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2018 - 2022
| Cement and concrete products | |
| Deputy President Masson | MELBOURNE, 25 OCTOBER 2018 |
Application for approval of the Holmes Nominees (Aust) Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2018-2022.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Holmes Nominees (Aust) Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2018-2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Holmes Nominees (Aust) Pty Ltd T/A Aus Pits. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
I observe the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
· Clause 17.1.2 – Maximum Weekly Hours
· Clause 31.1.2 – Annual Leave
· Clause 32.8 – Abandonment of Employment
However, noting clause 5.4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 November 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE500570 PR701746>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Holmes Nominees (Aust) Pty Ltd T/A Aus Pits [2018] FWCA 6588
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 6588
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was genuinely a product of the parties' free bargaining, if it contained all the mandated terms and conditions, and if it was fair and reasonable in all its parts. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement would have a detrimental effect on employees' job security or other employment conditions.
The Commission found that the agreement was indeed a product of genuine bargaining and contained all the required terms and conditions. It also found the agreement to be fair and reasonable, with no detrimental effects on employees' job security or other employment conditions. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement, finding that it met all the necessary criteria under the relevant industrial laws. The Commission's decision was based on the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.