Hollis Holdings Pty Ltd v Body Corp 'Noosa on the Beach' Community Titles Scheme Summary

[2002] QCA 460

COURT OF APPEAL

McPHERSON JA

Appeal No 2017 of 2002

No 4524 of 2002

HOLLIS HOLDINGS PTY LTD	First Appellant/ Applicant
and
HOLLIS PARTNERS PTY LTD	Second Appellant/ Applicant
and
BODY CORP "NOOSA ON THE BEACH"	Respondent/
COMMUNITY TITLES SCHEME	Respondent
BRISBANE ..DATE 31/10/2002
ORDER

31102002 T03/MSB1 M/T COA262/2002

McPHERSON JA: In each application order that by 4.30 p.m. on

Wednesday, 6 November 2002, the applicant comply with the

provisions of paragraph 26, and I mean by that the whole of it

not just one bit of it, all the sub-paragraphs, if that's what

they are, paragraph 28 of Practice Direction No. 26 of 1999 as	10
recently amended in 202. And I will order that the costs be costs in each application.
In respect of the costs of and incidental to each application
today, it is ordered that those costs be costs in the	20
principal application which of course is an application for leave to appeal.
Failing compliance with this order by that time the
application in each instance is to stand dismissed with costs.	30
Mr Hollis, I am told by the Registrar that on the last
occasion you suggested you might be filing another outline.
If that is so, if you intend to do that, you are required to
do it by 4.30 p.m. on Wednesday, the 6th of November along	40
with the other matters and should form part of the paginated bundle that is required for that occasion.

-----

50

2 60

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Hollis Holdings Pty Ltd and Hollis Partners Pty Ltd, the appellants, sought to appeal against a decision of the primary judge in relation to a dispute with the Body Corporate "Noosa on the Beach" Community Titles Scheme. The case was heard in the Court of Appeal in Queensland, with McPherson JA presiding. The appellants contested the primary judge's determination regarding the interpretation of certain provisions in the Community Titles Act 1998 (Qld) and sought clarification on their rights and obligations under the Act. The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal involved the interpretation and application of the statutory provisions governing the operation and management of community titles schemes, specifically focusing on the rights and responsibilities of lot owners and the body corporate.

The Court of Appeal considered the arguments presented by both parties and examined the relevant statutory provisions and case law. McPherson JA held that the primary judge's interpretation of the statutory provisions was correct and that the appellants' appeal was without merit. The Court found that the primary judge had properly applied the statutory framework and had reached a conclusion consistent with the legislative intent. The Court of Appeal further held that the appellants had failed to demonstrate any error in the primary judge's decision and, therefore, the appeal was dismissed with costs.

The final orders of the Court of Appeal mandated that the appellants comply with specific procedural requirements, including the submission of a paginated bundle and an outline, by a specified deadline. The Court also ordered that the costs of the appeal be borne by the appellants. Additionally, the Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the Court's practice directions and warned the appellants against further procedural missteps.

Hollis Holdings Pty Ltd v Body Corp 'Noosa on the Beach' Community Titles Scheme

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established