Hollier and Spaulding

The parties to this proceeding were Hollier and Spaulding, with the matter heard by Hannam J. The dispute concerned orders relating to the children of the parties, specifically concerning their access to schools, places of work, and other premises, as well as the obtaining of information about the children.

The court was required to determine the terms of protective orders concerning the children's safety and privacy. This included defining prohibited actions by one party in relation to the children's locations and their access to information held by third parties.

Hannam J made orders in terms of specified clauses of an exhibit, with modifications. These orders prohibited entering or remaining upon any school or place of work of the children, or any other premises or place at which the children might be attending. Additionally, the court ordered that a party should not attempt to obtain information about the children from any agency, including schools or health professionals, except for information that the father might, in his sole discretion, provide to the mother.

The court made orders in terms of clauses 1 to 5, (a) and (b), and 6 to 8 of exhibit 13. In lieu of order 5(c) in exhibit 13, the court made a new order as 5(c) and added a further order as 5(d). The form of these orders was noted as being subject to their entry in the Court’s records.