Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd Summary

[2013] FWCA 5557

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/7775)

HOLCIM (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD NEWCASTLE TRANSPORT AGREEMENT 2013-2016

Road transport industry
COMMISSIONER CARGILL	SYDNEY, 12 AUGUST 2013

Application for approval of the Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd Newcastle Transport Agreement 2013-2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd Newcastle Transport Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The company has provided a written undertaking in relation to the notice period for probationary employees in clause 13.1 of the Agreement. The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) being a bargaining representative has provided written support for the undertaking.

[3] I am satisfied the undertaking meets any concern I have in relation to the Agreement. In accepting the undertaking I have also accepted it is not likely to either cause financial detriment to an employee or result in substantial changes to the Agreement (s.190(3)). I note that under s.191 of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to the Agreement.

[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] The TWU has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 19 August 2013. The nominal expiry date is three (3) years from that date.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd, an employer, applied for the approval of the Newcastle Transport Agreement 2013-2016, which was submitted to the Fair Work Commission. The applicant sought approval of the agreement to facilitate the movement of goods and services in the transport industry. The matter was heard by the Fair Work Commission.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement was made in good faith and provided for a fair and efficient workplace. The applicant argued that the agreement was necessary to address specific workplace issues and was in the best interests of the parties involved. The Commission examined the negotiation process, the content of the agreement, and its implications for the employees and the employer.

In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and provided for a fair and efficient workplace. The Commission noted that the agreement addressed specific issues raised by the parties and provided for a fair distribution of benefits and obligations. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Accordingly, the Commission approved the Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd Newcastle Transport Agreement 2013-2016.

The Commission's decision was based on its finding that the agreement was made in good faith and provided for a fair and efficient workplace. The Commission considered the negotiation process, the content of the agreement, and its implications for the parties involved. The Commission found that the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009 and approved the agreement. The decision is significant as it provides guidance on the factors that the Commission considers when determining whether an agreement meets the criteria for approval under the Act.

Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established