Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia

Case

[2019] HCATrans 160


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia [2019] HCATrans 160 [2019] HCATrans 160

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of *Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia* concerned an application for access to government documents. The applicant, Dr Hocking, sought access to certain documents held by the National Archives, which were described as "Cabinet submissions and related documents" from the period of the Whitlam government. The Director-General of the National Archives, as the respondent, refused access to these documents. The matter came before the High Court of Australia.

The central legal issue before the High Court was whether the applicant was entitled to access the documents under the *Archives Act 1983* (Cth). Specifically, the Court had to consider the interpretation of provisions within the Act that govern the release of government records, particularly those that are still subject to access restrictions. This involved determining the scope of the Director-General's discretion and the criteria for refusing access to such documents.

The High Court's reasoning focused on the statutory framework established by the *Archives Act*. The Court examined the provisions relating to the examination and release of Commonwealth records, including the conditions under which access could be refused. The judges considered the public interest in transparency and access to historical government records, balanced against the need for confidentiality in certain circumstances. The Court ultimately found that the Director-General had not erred in his decision to refuse access to the documents in question, applying the relevant provisions of the Act.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Standing

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
High Court Bulletin [2019] HCAB 9

Cases Citing This Decision

5

High Court Bulletin [2019] HCAB 9
High Court Bulletin [2019] HCAB 8
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0